A logic-based model for resolving conflicts

Author:

Lempp Frieder

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the extent to which formal logic can be applied to conflict analysis and resolution. It is motivated by the idea that conflicts can be understood as inconsistent sets of interests. Design/methodology/approach – A simple propositional model, based on propositional logic, which can be used to analyze conflicts, has been introduced and four algorithms have been presented to generate possible solutions to a conflict. The model is illustrated by applying it to the conflict between the Obama administration and the Syrian Government in September 2013 over the destruction of Syria’s chemical weapons programme. Findings – The author shows how different solutions, such as compromises, minimally invasive solutions or solutions compatible with certain pre-defined norms, can be generated by the model. It is shown how the model can operate in situations where the game-theoretic model fails due to a lack of information about the parties’ utility values. Research limitations/implications – The model can be used as a theoretical framework for future experimental research and/or to trace the course of particular conflict scenarios. Practical implications – The model can be used as the basis for building software applications for conflict resolution practitioners, such as negotiators or mediators. Originality/value – While the idea of using logic to analyse the structure of conflicts and generate possible solutions is not new to the field of conflict studies, the model presented in this paper provides a novel way of understanding conflicts for both researchers and practitioners.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,Communication

Reference69 articles.

1. Anson, R. and Jelassi, T. (1990), “A development framework for computer-supported conflict resolution”, European Journal of Operational Research , Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 181-199.

2. Aumann, R. (1985), “What is game theory trying to accomplish?”, in Arrow, K. and Honkapohja, S. (Eds), Frontiers of Economics , Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 28-76.

3. Bartos, O. and Wehr, P. (2002), Using Conflict Theory , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY.

4. BBC News Middle East (2013a), “Q & A: Syria chemical weapons disarmament deal”, available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23876085 (accessed 2 November 2013).

5. BBC News Middle East (2013b), “Syria chemical attack: key UN findings”, available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-24130181 (accessed 3 November 2013).

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3