Whiteness from the top down: systemic change as antiracist action in LIS

Author:

Jennings AlyssaORCID,Kinzer KristineORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the paper is two-fold. The first is to inform the readers of the racist origins of libraries in America. Readers will learn about historic instances of systemic racism in libraries and those that persist today. The second purpose is to give readers examples of antiracist actions they can take on an individual level, in concert with library administration, and on the institutional level.Design/methodology/approachThis paper gives an overview of systemic racism in librarianship. Part I outlines the history of libraries and their institutional oppression origins in America. Part II reviews some of the current racial issues in Libraries and Information Science (LIS). Part III gives the author's viewpoint on how to incorporate antiracist action within libraries and how to decenter whiteness at the national level.FindingsThe authors found that libraries were established on institutional oppression and systemic racism, which continue to this day to center whiteness and disadvantage BIPOC. Having said that, now is the time to make changes, decenter whiteness and remove systemic barriers through antiracist actions. These actions will help increase the number of BIPOC working in libraries and improve the retention and promotion of those BIPOC too. If the American Library Association (ALA) heeds this call to action, Critical Race Theory (CRT) will become part of the Master's of Library and Information Science (MLIS), BIPOC will be better funded and supported, and the credentialing stigma will be removed.Originality/valueThis article highlights concrete action that should be taken beyond individual bias awareness and into systemic changes. It advocates for more critical awareness and daily antiracist action within the LIS field.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference56 articles.

1. AFL-CIO Department for Professional Employees (2021), “Library professionals: facts and figures. 2021 fact sheet”, available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d10ef48024ce300010f0f0c/t/60c24d4d903e4a17f8629234/1623346509173/Library+Workers+Facts+%26+Figures+2021+%282%29.pdf (accessed 23 August 2021).

2. American Library Association, Committee on Accreditation of the American Library Association (2019), “Standards for accreditation of master's programs in library and information studies”, available at: https://www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org.educationcareers/files/content/standards/Standards_2015_adopted_02-02-15.pdf (accessed 21 June 2021).

3. American Library Association, Spectrum Scholarship Program (2017), “Frequently asked questions”, available at: http://www.ala.org/advocacy/spectrum/faq (accessed 8 June 2021).

4. Bedell, M.S. (1983), “Employment and income of negro workers: 1940–52”, in Foner, P.S. and Lewis, R. (Eds), The Black Worker from the Founding of the CIO to the AFL Merger, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Vol. 7, pp. 1936-1955.

5. Belarde-Lewis, M.H. and Kostelecky, S.R. (2021), “Tribal critical race theory in Zuni Pueblo: information access in a cautious community”, in Leung, S.Y. and Lopez-McKnight, J.R. (Eds), Knowledge Justice: Disrupting Library and Information Studies through Critical Race Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 96-110, available at: ProQuest Ebook Central (accessed 2 June 2021).

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3