Author:
Rideout Glenn W.,Morton Larry L.
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to examine a variety of demographic, experiential, and philosophical orientation variables that may be predictive of pupil control ideologies (PCI) for teacher candidates at the beginning of a pre‐service program. In particular, it sets out to provide empirically grounded generalizations regarding the relationship between philosophical orientations and PCI. Philosophical orientation variables identified candidates' beliefs about key educational concepts.Design/methodology/approachQuantitative methodology was used in this study. Data from approximately 720 pre‐service participants in a pre‐service teacher education program were analysed via a series of correlational and multiple regression analyses.FindingsThese data supported the conclusion that while demographic and experiential variables were predictive of PCI at the beginning of the teacher preparation program, the most predictive variables were contained within the philosophical orientations variable cluster.Research limitations/implicationsThese findings provide empirical evidence of a link between what beginning teachers believe about education and their approach at the beginning of their teacher education program to pupil control in the classroom.Originality/valueThese findings identify circumstances that may assist in attracting males into elementary teaching at a time when major teacher organizations are highlighting this perceived weakness in the teacher recruitment process. Additionally, the study recommends inclusion in teacher preparation programs of curriculum units pertaining to pre‐service teachers' beliefs about education, and provides suggestions for the content of such units.
Subject
Public Administration,Education
Reference55 articles.
1. Bartlett, V. (1976), “The influence of selected substantive, behavioural and environmental dimensions on pupil control ideology”, unpublished Master of Educational Administration dissertation, The University of New England, Hanover, NH.
2. Bauch, P. and Goldring, E. (1998), “Parent‐teacher participation in the context of school governance”, Peabody Journal of Education, Vol. 73 No. 1, pp. 15‐35.
3. Bedard, G. and Lawton, S. (2000), “The struggle for power and control: shifting policy‐making models and the Harris agenda for education in Ontario”, Canadian Public Administration, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 241‐69.
4. Bernard, J.‐L., Hill, D., Falter, P. and Wilson, W. (2004), “Narrowing the gender gap: attracting men to teaching”, The Ontario College of Teachers, available at: www.oct.ca/en/CollegePublications/PDF/Men_In_Teaching_e.pdf.
5. Blust, R. and Willower, D. (1979), “Organizational pressure, personal ideology and teacher pupil control behaviour”, The Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 68‐74.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献