Service production process: implications for service productivity

Author:

Agya Yalley Andrews,Singh Sekhon Harjit

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to differentiate the production process within services from the dominant manufacturing-based production process, with the objective of delineating the production process in services and highlighting its implication for service productivity. Design/methodology/approach – This study critically reviewed the extant literature on the production processes in manufacturing and services from a multidisciplinary perspective and proposed a framework for the service production process and its relationship with service productivity. Findings – The production process for services differs from the dominant manufacturing-based production process and entails an input, transformation process and outcome dimensions. Therefore, any advancement in services, particularly the conceptualisation and measurement of service productivity, is dependent on the application of a service-specific production process. Research limitations/implications – The understanding and delineation of the production process in services would further scholarly understanding of what is means to be productive in services and the impact on the validity of the conceptualisation and measurement of service productivity and other service-related concepts. Practical implications – The proposed service-based production process can further managerial understanding of the measurement and management of productivity in services. Originality/value – This paper delineates the production process in services and highlighted its implication for service productivity. This study, therefore, is a step forward in developing service-specific concepts and measures, particularly service productivity.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference111 articles.

1. Adam, E.E. , Hershauer, J.C. and Ruch, W.A. (1981), “Developing quality productivity ratios for public sector personnel services”, Public Productivity Review, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 45-61.

2. Albino, V. , Izzo, C. and Kühtz, S. (2002), “Input-output models for the analysis of a local/global supply chain”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 78 No. 2, pp. 119-131.

3. Anderson, E.W. , Fornell, C. and Mazvancheryl, S.K. (2004), “Customer satisfaction and shareholder value”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68 No. 4, pp. 172-185.

4. Andreoni, A. (2011), “Manufacturing Agrarian change: agricultural production, inter-sectoral learning and technological capabilities”, Working Paper No. 11-13, Aalborg, DRUID.

5. Arnett, H.E. and Schmeichel, N.R. (1984), Increasing Productivity in the United States: A Political, Social and Economic Policy Approach, National Association of Accountants, NJ.

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3