The significance of formal training in project‐based companies

Author:

Aramo‐Immonen Heli,Koskinen Kaj U.,Porkka Pasi L.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the significance of formal training in project‐based companies.Design/methodology/approachFirst the discussion deals with the concepts of learning, the learning environment, and the motivation to learn in a way in which special focus is on the project team members' motivation to learn. The hypothesis, “People working for project‐based companies are not interested in formal training” is tested by an empirical study, which was conducted on ten Finnish marine and offshore industry companies. Altogether, 54 project team members and project managers attended the multiple‐case study.FindingsAccording to the results of the study, formal training is not seen as a necessity among the people working for project‐based companies. This seems to mean that nowadays formal training does not play a significant role in the development of project‐based companies. Further, the people do not necessarily have time to reflect because they are being bombarded by urgent problems and pressing deadlines. A lack of time and a feeling of heavy work load seem to be a normal practise.Originality/valueBased upon the paper's findings, further research is suggested that would be focussed first on designing integrated learning environments in project‐based companies' processes, and/or second on the training methods utilized, interaction between trainers and project people, and relevancy and efficiency of formal training offered by training organizations to the project‐based companies.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference68 articles.

1. Aramo‐Immonen, H. (2009), Project Management Ontology – The Organizational Learning Perspective, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Publication No. 836.

2. Aramo‐Immonen, H. and Porkka, P.L. (2008), “Positive trigger for proactive project management improvement”, in Kujala, J. and Iskanius, P. (Eds), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Productivity and Quality Research, ICPQR, Oulu, Finland, June 25‐27.

3. Aramo‐Immonen, H. and Porkka, P.L. (2009), “Shared knowledge in project‐based companies' value chain”, International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, Vol. 3, pp. 364‐78.

4. Argyris, C. (1982), “How learning and reasoning processes affect organizational change”, in Goodman, P.S. (Ed.), Change in Organizations: New Perspectives on Theory, Research, and Practice, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 46‐86.

5. Argyris, C. and Schön, D. (1978), Organizational Learning, A Theory of Action, Addisson‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3