Author:
Örtenblad Anders,Koris Riina
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine systematically and reflectively the relevance of four different aspects/types of the learning organization idea to higher educational institutions (HEIs), from three ideal-typical stakeholder perspectives: the managerial perspective, the employee perspective and the societal perspective.
Design/methodology/approach
– Literature review of 73 prior works on the relevance of the learning organization idea to HEIs, and a systematic examination from different stakeholder perspectives, i.e. an examination based on a “multi-stakeholder contingency approach.”
Findings
– The learning organization idea needs to be reformulated to some extent to become fully relevant to HEIs.
Research limitations/implications
– The “multi-stakeholder contingency approach” can be used advantageously in any contextualization study of the learning organization idea as well as in contextualizing any other fashionable management idea.
Practical implications
– The learning organization idea should not be adopted uncritically by HEIs, nor should it be uncritically rejected. In particular, HEIs should avoid becoming too organic and instead, be moderate when adopting the “learning structure” aspect/type of the learning organization idea.
Social implications
– It is recommended that the societal perspective be prioritized, in that HEIs are mainly for society.
Originality/value
– In contrast to the previous stock of literature on HEIs as learning organizations, which, generally speaking, is non-cumulative, uncritical, incongruent and unsystematic, this paper systematically and reflectively examines the relevance of various definitions of the learning organization from diverse and explicit stakeholder perspectives.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education
Reference140 articles.
1. Abu-Tineh, A.M.
(2011), “Exploring the relationship between organizational learning and career resilience among faculty members at Qatar University”, The International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 635-650.
2. Agaoglu, E.
(2006), “The reflection of the learning organization concept to school of education”, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 132-148, available at: www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/000019b/80/27/f7/44.pdf (accessed December 21, 2008).
3. Ali, K.A.
(2012), “Academic staff's perceptions of characteristics of learning organization in a higher learning institution”, The International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 55-82.
4. Anderson, G.
(2008), “Mapping academic resistance in the managerial university”, Organization, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 251-270.
5. Appelbaum, S.H.
and
Goransson, L.
(1997), “Transformational and adaptive learning within the learning organization: a framework for research and application”, The Learning Organization, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 115-128.
Cited by
69 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献