Peer support in community settings: getting back to our roots

Author:

Crepaz-Keay David

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to look at peer support in the context of broader communities. Design/methodology/approach It builds on the author’s experience working with the Mental Health Foundation of developing delivering and evaluating several self-management and peer support initiatives in a variety of settings with a range of different peer groups. It will consider what constitutes a peer and a community, and explore the notion of community solutions for community problems. Findings Peer support in community settings has the capacity to address social isolation, build skills and self-esteem and give individuals a better quality of life – it can also add value to whole communities and reframe the way entire groups are considered within them. It has the ability to be both more accessible and less stigmatising and thus reach more people. This also offers community based peer support as a contributor to preventing the deterioration of mental health and potentially reducing the impact of mental ill-health. Social implications The author needs to think more in terms of whole community and get better at improving how the author measures and articulates this community benefit. This will allow us to make better decisions about how best to apply resources for long term whole community gain. Peer support and peer leadership needs to be at the heart of this process. Originality/value This paper places a familiar approach in a different setting placing peer support firmly outside services and within comunities.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health(social science),Phychiatric Mental Health,Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference20 articles.

1. A new self-management intervention for people with severe psychiatric diagnoses;Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice,2012

2. Crepaz-Keay, D. and Cyhlarova, E. (2015), “Ethical issues in mental health peer support”, in Sadler, J., van Staden, W. and Fulford, K. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Psychiatric Ethics, OUP, Oxford, pp. 245-54.

3. Crepaz-Keay, D., Fulford, K. and van Staden, W. (2015), “Putting both a person and people first: interdependence, values-based practice and African Batho Pele as resources for co-production in mental health”, in Sadler, J., van Staden, W. and Fulford, K. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Psychiatric Ethics, OUP, Oxford, pp. 60-87.

4. Crepaz-Keay, D., Cyhlarova, E., Daumerie, N. and Marsili, M. (2015), “Lessons from Lille”, in Crepaz-Keay, D. (Ed.), Mental Health Today and Tomorrow, Pavilion, Brighton, pp. 157-65.

5. An evaluation of peer-led self-management training for people with severe psychiatric diagnoses;The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice,2015

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. “One of Us”/“One of them”: negotiating peer support on a men’s mental health ward;Mental Health and Social Inclusion;2024-08-22

2. ‘It depends what you mean by leadership’: An analysis of stakeholder perspectives on consumer leadership;International Journal of Mental Health Nursing;2018-10-03

3. The growing pains of peer support;Mental Health and Social Inclusion;2017-06-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3