Author:
Nelson Jody,Morrison Joan,Whitson Lindsey
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to describe the MacEwan University Library’s successful pilot of a fully blended information literacy (IL) instruction program for first-year English courses. Development, implementation and assessment of the pilot prior to full implementation are discussed.
Design/methodology/approach
– The new sustainable blended model for the English Library Instruction Program reduced duplication of content and effort, incorporated online and in-person instruction and promoted self-directed learning opportunities through a new Learning Commons. This model places essential instruction online while maintaining personal relationships for students with the English Librarian and the Library through multiple points of interaction. Face-to-face instruction efforts were concentrated on developing critical thinking skills through a hands-on source evaluation activity and on providing point-of-need support. Librarians worked closely with English faculty to encourage early voluntary adoption of the new model for the Fall 2013 pilot.
Findings
– The voluntary early-adopter model worked well for garnering and maintaining support from the English department: the authors had 42 per cent of English sessions piloting the new model for Fall 2013, surpassing the initial target of 25 per cent. Students scored well on an assessment of their ability to identify scholarly sources. Librarian preparation time has been greatly reduced.
Originality/value
– Many academic libraries are looking to asynchronous online tutorials as a more sustainable model for delivering IL instruction. This case study demonstrates that it is possible to move some instruction online while maintaining the personal relationships librarians have forged with students and faculty.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference25 articles.
1. Anderson, K.
and
May, F.A.
(2010), “Does the method of instruction matter? An experimental examination of information literacy instruction in the online, blended, and face-to-face classrooms”,
Journal of Academic Librarianship
, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 495-500.
2. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL)
(2000), “Information literacy competency standards for higher education”, available at: www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency (accessed 29 September 2014).
3. Borup, J.
,
West, R.E.
,
Thomas, R.A.
and
Graham, C.R.
(2014), “Examining the impact of video feedback on instructor social presence in blended courses”,
International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning
, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 232-256.
4. Gandhi, S.
(2004), “Faculty-librarian collaboration to assess the effectiveness of a five-session library instruction model”,
Community & Junior College Libraries
, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 15-48.
5. Garrison, D.R.
and
Kanuka, H.
(2004), “Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education”,
Internet and Higher Education
, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 95-105.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献