To which extent do projects explore the opportunity space?

Author:

Samset Knut,Andersen Bjorn,Austeng Kjell

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore a selection of projects to understand how conceptual appraisals and choice of concepts are handled, and to which extent the conceptual opportunity space is exploited. Design/methodology/approach – The study is essentially case based, and rooted in a number of in-depth studies of single-project cases. Its study combines information from document studies with interview data, and culminates in normative recommendations. Findings – The study found that the projects do indeed not exploit the opportunity space to a very large extent. The lessons from the present study is that the final choice is determined more by decision makers than the analysts, and will often be the result of policy and preferences more than objective reasoning. Which again suggests that the efforts as analysts will often be in vain. Research limitations/implications – These findings could influence theoretical models outlining project establishment and decision processes. Practical implications – The study has identified many shortcomings in public sector processes that could be utilized to alter such processes. Originality/value – The study is original in that it focusses on the concept development phase of projects, rather than the traditional execution phase, and has studied decision processes.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference16 articles.

1. Braybrooke, D. and Lindblom, C.E. (1963), A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process, The Free Press of Glencoe Collier-Macmillan, London.

2. Christensen, K. (1985), “Coping with uncertainty in planning”, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 63-73.

3. Dosi, G. (1997), “Opportunities, incentives and the collective patterns of technological change”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 107 No. 444, pp. 1530-1547.

4. Engwall, M. (2002), “The futile dream of the perfect goal”, in Sahlin Anderson, K. and Soderholm, A. (Eds), Beyond Project Management, Copenhagen Business School Press, Malmö, pp. 261-277.

5. Lindblom, C.E. (1959), “The science of muddling through”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 79-88.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3