Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to outline the anatomy of small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) that try to manage corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the supply chain.Design/methodology/approachThe data used for analysis stem from a large‐scale survey of 1,071 Danish SMEs carried out in 2005.FindingsIt is concluded that CSR activities directed towards the supply chains still remain the privilege of a small group of SMEs with quite advanced CSR systems.Research limitations/implicationsThe survey was not specifically designed for this article. Moreover, only Danish SMEs participated in the survey. Whether the evidence from Denmark can be generalised to cover SMEs in other countries is left to determine.Practical implicationsThe results indicate that there may be a need for more differentiated initiatives to promote CSR that will enable smaller enterprises to address CSR issues in the supply chain. Thus far, CSR has often been associated with large, high‐profile multinationals that have been trying to protect their image and brands from negative press, NGO activism, consumer boycotts and governmental sanctions. Little has been done to examine how SMEs can improve social and environmental conditions in cooperation with suppliers.Originality/valueThis article contributes to the existing body of literature by examining how a number of key SME characteristics affect the management of CSR.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference63 articles.
1. Andriof, J. and McIntosh, M. (2001), “Introduction”, in Andriof, J. and McIntosh, M. (Eds), Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, pp. 14‐24.
2. Carroll, A.B. (1979), “A three‐dimensional model of corporate performance”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 497‐505.
3. Bell, J. and Young, S. (1998), “Towards an integrative framework of the internationalization of the firm”, in Hooley, G., Loveridge, R. and Wilson, D. (Eds), Internationalization – Process, Context and Markets, Macmillan, New York, NY, pp. 5‐28.
4. Blowfield, M. and Frynas, J.G. (2005), “Setting new agendas: critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world”, International Affairs, Vol. 81 No. 3, pp. 499‐513.
5. Bowen, F.E. (2002), “Does size matter? Organizational slack and visibility as alternative explanations for environmental responsiveness”, Business & Society, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 118‐24.
Cited by
113 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献