Author:
Spray Erika,Holbrook Allyson,Scevak Jill,Cantwell Robert
Abstract
Purpose
Learners’ dispositional attributes form the foundations for their learning behaviour and therefore academic outcomes. This study aims to explore the dispositional attributes of postgraduate learners in coursework programs, and to understand the relationships between dispositional attributes and academic achievement at this level.
Design/methodology/approach
This study profiled the dispositions towards learning of 880 Master’s students in Australia, reported in an online survey. Statistical analysis was used to explore the possibility of underlying dispositional dimensions and latent clusters of participants within the cohort.
Findings
The profile of the cohort overall was as expected for an elite academic group, yet there was substantial variation between individuals. Cluster analysis identified three groups of students with meaningfully different dispositional profiles. Exploratory factor analysis revealed two underlying dispositional dimensions, representing epistemic and agentic attributes. Epistemic attributes were most closely related to academic achievement.
Practical implications
It is argued that students at Master’s level typically possess the agentic attributes necessary for effective self-regulation. At this level, therefore, epistemic attributes are more relevant for differentiating between higher and lower achieving students. The attainment of sophisticated epistemic attributes is in line with the stated goals of postgraduate education. This supports the explicit teaching of metacognitive and epistemic skills within postgraduate degrees.
Originality/value
This study contributes a detailed analysis of Master’s students’ dispositional profiles. Two underlying dispositional dimensions are identified, representing agentic and epistemic attributes. The importance of epistemic attributes for postgraduate academic achievement identifies an opportunity for targeted interventions to raise the quality of learning at this level.
Reference85 articles.
1. Why this and why now? Introduction to the special issue on metacognition, self-regulation and self-regulated learning;Educational Psychology Review,2008
2. Reflective journaling and metacognitive awareness: insights from a longitudinal study in higher education;Reflective Practice,2020
3. Empowering teachers to personalize learning support;Utilizing Learning Analytics to Support Study Success,2019
4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2020), “Sample size calculator”, available at: www.abs.gov.au/
5. Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA) (2018), “Belonging, being and becoming: the early years framework for Australia”, available at: www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2018-02/belonging_being_and_becoming_the_early_years_learning_framework_for_australia.pdf