Author:
Pan Jeh‐Nan,Kuo Tzu‐Chun,Bretholt Abraham
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this research is to develop a new key performance index (KPI) and its interval estimation for measuring the service quality from customers' perceptions, since most service quality data follow non‐normal distribution.Design/methodology/approachBased on the non‐normal process capability indices used in manufacturing industries, a new KPI suitable for measuring service quality is developed using Parasuraman's 5th Gap between customers' expectation and perception. Moreover, the confidence interval of the proposed KPI is established using the bootstrapping method.FindingsThe quantitative method for measuring the service quality through the new KPI and its interval estimation is illustrated by a realistic example. The results show that the new KPI allows practising managers to evaluate the actual service quality level delivered within each of five SERVQUAL categories and prioritize the possible improvement projects from customers' perspectives. Moreover, compared with the traditional method of sample size determination, a substantial amount of cost savings can be expected by using the suggested sample sizes.Practical implicationsThe paper presents a structured approach of opportunity assessment for improving service quality from a strategic alignment perspective, particularly in the five dimensions: tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. The new approach provides practising managers with a decision‐making tool for measuring service quality, detecting problematic situations and selecting the most urgent improvement project. Once the existing service problems are identified and improvement projects are prioritized, it can lead to the direction of continuous improvement for any service industry.Originality/valueGiven a managerial target on any desired service level as well as customers' perceptions and expectations, the new KPI could be applied to any non‐normal service quality and other survey data. Thus, the corporate performance in terms of key factors of business success can also be measured by the new KPI, which may lead to managing complexities and enhancing sustainability in service industries.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Computer Science Applications,Industrial relations,Management Information Systems
Reference28 articles.
1. Chatterjee, A., Ghosh, C. and Bandyopadhyay, S. (2009), “Assessing students' rating in higher education: a SERVQUAL approach”, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, Vol. 20 No. 10, pp. 1095‐109.
2. Chen, J.P. and Chen, K.S. (2004), “Comparing the capability of two process using CPM”, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 329‐35.
3. Chen, J.P. and Tong, L.I. (2003), “Bootstrap confidence of the difference between two process capability indices”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 249‐56.
4. Choi, K.C., Nam, K.H. and Park, D.H. (1996), “Estimation of capability based on bootstrap method”, Microelectronic Reliability, Vol. 36 No. 9, pp. 1141‐53.
5. Clement, J.A. (1989), “Process capability calculation for non‐normal distributions”, Quality Progress, Vol. 22 No. 9, pp. 95‐100.
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献