Author:
Bhandarker Asha,Rai Snigdha
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to elucidate the distressing impact of toxic leadership on the mental state of the subordinates and examine the unique coping mechanisms used by them to deal with such leaders. The paper also examined the relationship between psychological distress and coping strategy used by subordinates to deal with the toxic leader.
Design/methodology/approach
This study presents a validity testing of two scales. The first scale was designed to measure experienced psychological distress emanating from exposure to toxic leaders, and the second scale aims to assess the coping strategies utilized by subordinates to deal with the toxic leaders. Data were collected from 570 employees working in public as well as private organizations in India.
Findings
The results of this paper supported the theorized two three-dimensional tools to measure: psychological distress (loss of self-worth, withdrawal and agitated) and coping strategies to deal with toxic leaders (assertive coping, avoidance coping and adaptive coping). Reliability estimates and construct validity of both the tools were established. The results also suggest that the loss of self-worth was negatively related with assertive coping, avoidance coping and adaptive coping. However, withdrawal was positively related with assertive coping and avoidance coping. Finally, agitation was positively related with avoidance and adaptive coping.
Originality/value
To the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the rare studies to examine together the phenomenon of both psychological distress experienced by subordinates and the coping strategies utilized by them to deal with toxic leaders.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Public Administration,Applied Psychology
Reference88 articles.
1. Sabotage in the workplace: the role of organizational injustice;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2002
2. Abusive supervision and contextual performance: the mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure;Management and Organization Review,2008
3. Ashforth, B. (2003), “Petty tyranny in organizations”, in Porter, L.W., Angle, H.L. and Allen, R.W. (Eds), Organizational Influence Processes, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York, NY, pp. 151-171.
4. Petty tyranny in organizations: a preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences;Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences,1997
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献