Perceived justice as predictors of a successful pay equity plan: a Canadian case study
Author:
Cloutier Julie,Lamarche Benoit
Abstract
Purpose
– This study aims to identify the predictors of successful implementations of pay equity plans. Drawing on the perspective of organizational justice, this study highlights the factors that lead to the establishment of perceived fair pay for female-dominated jobs.
Design/methodology/approach
– Qualitative data were collected from 107 respondents in a Canadian company that implemented a pay equity plan as required by the Quebec Pay Equity Act.
Findings
– Justice perceptions of employees are based on: uniformity of implementation, bias suppression with respect to the right to fair pay, reliability of information on job content, relevance of job evaluation criteria, qualifications and impartiality of the pay equity committee members and the quality of employees’ representation and process transparency.
Research limitations/implications
– This study was conducted at a single workplace and among relatively highly educated respondents. Replicating the study may allow to verify the transferability of the results by considering workers’ demographic characteristics and organizational culture.
Practical implications
– The study highlights the cornerstones that may guide the development of an assessment tool of the effectiveness of pay equity processes. These results will additionally help employers to circumvent difficulties which may otherwise thwart the implementation of pay equity plans.
Originality/value
– This study highlights how employees construct their perceptions of justice in a specific context. It sheds light on the salient features of the pay equity implementation, the sources of information involved and the justice rules used. This study also highlights the specific forms of the justice rules in this context.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Gender Studies
Reference40 articles.
1. Adams, S.J.
(1965), “Inequity in social exchange”, in
Berkowitz, L.
(Ed.),
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
, Academic Press, New York, NY, Vol. 2, pp. 267-299. 2. Arvey, R.D.
(1986), “Sex bias in job evaluation procedures”,
Personnel Psychology
, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 315-335. 3. Austin, W.
(1977), “Equity theory and social comparison processes”, in
Suls, T.
and
Miller, R.
(Eds),
Social Comparison Process
, Hemisphere, Washington, DC, pp. 279-305. 4. Baker, M.
and
Fortin, N.M.
(2004), “Comparable worth in a decentralized labour market: the case of Ontario”,
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Economique
, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 850-878. 5. Bryman, A.
and
Bell, E.
(2007),
Business Research Methods
, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|