Employee sensemaking in the transition to nomadic work

Author:

Bean Cynthia J.,Eisenberg Eric M.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present the results of a qualitative study of employees' sensemaking as a social, communicative process during a major organizational transformation.Design/methodology/approachThis case study describes a major transition in work mode, from traditional officing to nomadic work. Nomadic work is a radical new mode of work that emphasizes: worker mobility both at and away from the company facility; a paperless operation; and integrated technological platforms that enable knowledge work and flexible, project‐based organizing. Relying on participant observation and interviews, employee accounts were gathered of their experiences as told during the change implementation.FindingsIt was found that shocks noted in social interaction indicated that employee sensemaking was anchored by frames relying on identity, culture, or structure as the primary stabilizing discourse called into question. The findings suggest that employees used sensemaking to work out the tensions between social action and the systemic realities of organizational life.Originality/valueThe study contributes to the organizational literature by responding to the call for more research on social interaction during change implementation processes and on the implementation of new information technologies.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference30 articles.

1. Angrosino, M. and Mays de Perez, K. (2000), “Rethinking observation: from method to context”, in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 673‐702.

2. Barley, S.R. (1986), “Technology as an occasion of structuring: evidence from observation of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 31, pp. 98‐108.

3. Barrett, F., Thomas, G. and Hocevar, S. (1995), “The central role of discourse in large‐scale change: a social construction perspective”, The Journal of Applied Science, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 352‐73.

4. Boje, D.M. (2001), Narrative Methods for Organizational & Communication Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

5. Davenport, T. and Pearlson, K. (1998), “Two cheers for the virtual office”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 51‐67.

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3