The development of performance measures through an activity based benchmarking project across an international network of academic libraries

Author:

Hart Simon,Amos Howard

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to outline the findings from the initial stages of an activity-based benchmarking project developed across an international network of academic libraries. Through working on a shared response to the question: “if we enable and support the academic endeavour how do we measure our effectiveness?” the network of libraries is using the formal mechanism of benchmarking as a means of continuous improvement. Design/methodology/approach – Actual improvements as a result of benchmarking are known to arise from considering and looking at processes, tools and techniques rather than from simply comparing and reviewing measurements of activity. The establishment of the Matariki Network of Universities provided the opportunity to begin work on international benchmarking amongst the member libraries. The project is a collaborative exercise involving comparisons across the libraries on a selected number of services and activities that are similar across the institutions and are representative of overall library service provision. In this first stage of the project the focus is on support for teaching and learning, specifically activities and programmes that support the transition of first-year students into university life. To simplify the process the libraries have shared details in relation to specific cohorts of students. In order to achieve this, participating libraries used an online collaborative workspace to respond to a series of questions. These responses were analysed to identify common themes, highlight exemplars and select further topics for discussion. Findings – Acknowledging the challenge of international collaboration, processes and mechanisms were developed. It was important to establish a shared language with a set of agreed terms and definitions. Similarly, taking time for each partner to contribute to the project has been valuable. Consideration of each of the libraries responses to the survey questions reveals a diverse number of activities and practices that represent a strong commitment to the needs of students. Drawing on institutional strategic direction and policy, each library allocates substantial resourcing to these activities and practices. The exercise within the benchmarking project produced a valuable set of data for each library to review and learn from. In terms of managing the project, findings are consistent with those reported in the administration of other benchmarking projects. The libraries are in the early stages of developing a series of common international performance measures. It is evident that learning more detail about assessment processes used across each library is necessary to advance the project aims. Further work with the project partners on measuring the effectiveness of their activities will allow the testing of the application of a maturity model for quality improvement of library assessment practices. Research limitations/implications – The project provides the opportunity to develop a series of performance measures that can be verified across an international network of libraries. Sharing information on activities and practices that impact upon the wider institution provides a means to review and improve library assessment practices. Originality/value – This paper outlines the first benchmarking activity in the development of a review of performance measures through an activity-based benchmarking project. The activity included an international network of academic libraries. This work will lead to benchmarking effectiveness measures and the development of a library assessment capability maturity model. This will offer a development path, and a better understanding of progress, to demonstrate value and provide evidence of successful outcomes.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference17 articles.

1. Amos, H. and Hart, S. (2013), “International collaboration for quality: a case study of fostering collaboration across an international network of university libraries through an activity based benchmarking project”, Proceedings of the 34th Annual IATUL Conference, Cape Town, available at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2013/papers/48/ (accessed 14 March 2013).

2. Burquel, N. and van Vught, F. (2010), “Benchmarking in European higher education: a step beyond current quality models”, Tertiary Education and Management, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 243-255.

3. Crawford, J.K. (2006), “The project management maturity model”, Information Systems Management, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 50-58.

4. Epper, R.M. (1999), “Applying benchmarking to higher education: some lessons from experience”, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 24-31.

5. Fielden, J. and Carr, M. (2000), “CHEMS international benchmarking club”, in Jackson, N. and Lund, H. (Eds), Benchmarking for Higher Education, Open University Press, Buckingham, pp. 195-212.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Measuring project maturity of organizations conducting research projects using a university as an example;Procedia Computer Science;2024

2. Benchmarking for Library and Information Services;Reference Module in Social Sciences;2024

3. Research and benchmarking;The Solo Librarian;2024

4. Why qualitative benchmarking?;Benchmarking Library, Information and Education Services;2023

5. Benchmarking the impact, quality, and value of an academic online e-Library;Benchmarking Library, Information and Education Services;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3