Simulation-based learning in management education

Author:

Lu Jiafang,Hallinger Philip,Showanasai Parinya

Abstract

Purpose – Proponents have argued that simulation-based learning (SBL) offers capabilities that respond to persisting critiques of management education. This research intended to provide additional empirical evidence for the instructional effectiveness of SBL. This paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – This research adopted a quasi-experimental, multiple time series design to examine the instructional effectiveness of courses that incorporated computer simulations in a Master of Management program at a business school in Thailand. It compared student perceptions of three SBL courses with courses that used a variety of other instructional approaches over a period of seven years. Findings – Results revealed that students rated the SBL courses significantly higher on overall perceived instructional effectiveness, as manifested by action-directed learning, student engagement, quality of assessment and feedback, and instructor effectiveness. Research limitations/implications – The consistency of significant results for a large number of course sections over a substantial period of time suggests that the SBL courses created a more active, productive environment in which to learn management theory and practice. Practical implications – The results support assertions that simulations offer potential for enhancing the quality of university-based management education. Originality/value – First, the research provides empirical insights into the implementation of SBL in management education; second, many instructors remain skeptical as to whether active learning methods imported from western contexts are suitable for Asian learners. The study addresses this issue in the light of data that describe one institution's sustained attempt to employ computer simulations in its graduate management education program.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference75 articles.

1. Adobor, H. and Daneshfar, A. (2006), “Management simulations: determining their effectiveness”, The Journal of Management Development, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 151-168.

2. Aleamoni, L. (1999), “Student ratings myths versus research facts from 1924 to 1998”, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 153-166.

3. Alter, A. , Oppenheimer, D. , Epley, N. and Eyre, R. (2007), “Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytical thought”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 136 No. 4, pp. 569-576.

4. Anderson, P. , Beverage, D. , Scott, T. , Hofmeister, D.L. and Scott, T.W. (2000), Threshold Entrepreneur: A New Business Venture Simulation, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, available at: www.greatsims.com/

5. Baldwin, T. and Ford, J. (1988), “Transfer of training: a review and directions for future research”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 63-105.

Cited by 41 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3