Author:
Fernández-Mesa Anabel,Luis Ferreras-Méndez José,Alegre Joaquin,Chiva Ricardo
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to analyze the impact of information technology competency (ITC) on internal and external learning competency and the relations among ITC, internal and external learning competency and the commercial success of innovation (CSI)
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper uses survey data from 186 companies. Through structural equation modeling the paper assesses the links between ITC, internal and external learning competency and the CSI.
Findings
– First, this study finds that ITC plays a critical role in internal and external learning competencies. Second, internal and external learning competencies are directly related to the CSI. Third, internal and external learning competencies mediate the relation between ITC and the CSI.
Research limitations/implications
– The research is cross-sectional, so cause-effect relation cannot be definitively inferred from the results.
Originality/value
– This study contributes to organizational learning research, identifying a key antecedent of internal and external learning competencies – ITC – and analyzing the link between internal and external learning competencies and the CSI. Moreover, this study is relevant to IT literature because it shows that ITC, on its own, is insufficient to generate and maintain a competitive advantage. Firms need complementary strategic capabilities such as learning competencies to strengthen the effect of ITC on firm performance.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Computer Science Applications,Industrial relations,Management Information Systems
Reference64 articles.
1. Alavi, M.
and
Leidner, D.E.
(2001), “Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 107-136.
2. Alegre, J.
,
Sengupta, K.
and
Lapiedra, R.
(2011), “Knowledge management and innovation performance in a high-tech SMEs industry”, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 454-470.
3. Anderson, J.C.
and
Gerbing, D.W.
(1988), “Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 411-423.
4. Argote, L.
(2011), “Organizational learning research: past, present and future”, Management Learning, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 439-446.
5. Argyris, C.
and
Schön, D.
(1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献