Author:
Beglaryan Mane,Drampyan Anush,Sargsyan Parandzem
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to analyze the factors that affect the attitudes of Armenian small and medium enterprises (SMEs) regarding digitalization, examining whether they view it as a tool to foster innovation and business growth, while also assessing the extent to which digitalization mitigated the negative impacts of the COVID-19 crisis.
Design/methodology/approach
The empirical approach is based on data collected from 452 Armenian SMEs, which were further analyzed using SPSS Statistics 23.0 software. Scales for assessing the COVID-19 impact, innovation and digitalization were constructed and validated. To test five hypotheses, binomial logistic regression was conducted to appraise the importance of digitalization for Armenian SMEs, including the ability to mitigate the consequences of the recent COVID-19 pandemic.
Findings
The results of the analysis showed that the economic sector plays a significant role in forming the expectations of firms on the positive impact of digitalization, while the company size does not affect them. This paper found that the provision of online services before the pandemic did not help Armenian SMEs to be less affected by the crisis. Furthermore, the perception of whether digitalization facilitated innovative processes, products and services did not depend on the degree of being affected by COVID-19. Finally, the findings indicate that the more agile companies which had the ability to convert their business model into an e-business model were less affected by the crisis.
Originality/value
This paper contributes to the literature by studying the effect of digitalization on SMEs, as well as how SMEs in small developing countries like Armenia mitigated the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The current work is unique as, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, there are no prior empirical studies focusing on impact of digitalization and innovation induced by exogenous shocks in an under-researched country like Armenia.
Reference114 articles.
1. Aghina, W., Handscomb, C., Ludolph, J., Róna, D. and West, D. (2020), “Enterprise agility: buzz or business impact?”, McKinsey and Company, available at: www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/enterprise-agility-buzz-or-business-impact (accessed 20 March 2020).
2. Akhvlediani, T. (2021), “Digital literacy in times of the COVID-19 in the eastern partnership countries”, EaP CSF COVID-19 POLICY PAPER, available at: www.ceps.eu/personal-site/tinatin-akhvledianiceps-eu/digital-literacy-in-times-of-the-covid-19-in-the-eastern-partnership-countries/
3. Small business awareness and adoption of state-of-the-art technologies in emerging and developing markets, and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic;Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship,2020
4. Organic structure and organisational learning as the main antecedents of workforce agility;International Journal of Production Research,2014
5. The impact of social capital and collaborative knowledge creation on e-business proactiveness and organizational agility in responding to the COVID-19 crisis;Journal of Innovation and Knowledge,2020