Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide an integrated list of heuristics and an information architecture (IA) framework for the heuristic evaluation of the IA of academic library websites as well as an evaluation framework with practical steps on how to conduct the evaluation.Design/methodology/approachA set of 14 heuristics resulted from an integration of existing usability principles from authorities in the field of usability. A review of IA literature resulted in a framework for dividing academic library websites into six dialogue elements. The resulting heuristics were made applicable to academic library websites through the addition of recommendations based on a review of 20 related studies.FindingsThis study provides heuristics, a framework and workflow guidelines that can be used by the various evaluators of academic library websites, i.e. library staff, web developers and usability experts, to provide recommendations for improving its usability.Research limitations/implicationsThe focus of the usability principles is the evaluation of the IA aspects of websites and therefore does not provide insights into accessibility or visual design aspects.Originality/valueThe main problem that is addressed by this study is that there are no clear guidelines on how to apply existing usability principles for the evaluation of the IA of academic library websites.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference63 articles.
1. Modeling a library website redesign process: developing a user-centered website through usability testing;Information Technology & Libraries,2013
2. Creative design of interactive products and use of usability guidelines – a contradiction?,2003
3. The perfect storm: examining user experience and conducting a usability test to investigate a disruptive academic library web site redevelopment;Journal of Web Librarianship,2016
4. Danino, N. (2001), “Heuristic evaluation – a step by step guide article”, SitePoint, 3 September, available at: www.sitepoint.com/heuristic-evaluation-guide/ (accessed 17 October 2016).
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献