Business process reengineering leadership: princes of Machiavelli
-
Published:2023-07-04
Issue:1
Volume:30
Page:41-59
-
ISSN:1751-1348
-
Container-title:Journal of Management History
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JMH
Author:
Mertens Dan,Villegas Salvador G.,Ware Marlon G.,Vengrouskie Edward F.,Lloyd Robert
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to establish a supported and validated reference point for Machiavellianism as an antecedent to the contemporary management philosophy of business process reengineering (BPR).
Design/methodology/approach
This paper analyzes BPR and Machiavellianism by using the seminal work of Hammer and Champy (1993) on BPR and the original writings of Machiavelli coupled with the personal correspondence of Machiavelli with his contemporaries.
Findings
The findings of this research indicate that the constructs of Machiavellian thought transcend the five centuries since the publication of The Prince, and can be found in the contemporary managerial framework of BPR. This comparison of historical leadership frameworks demonstrates how recent management decisions in companies show the rise of Machiavellian as BPR. In an analysis of these theories, the authors show similarities in five significant tenets of business leadership and argue how these repackaged ideas and prescriptions undermine employee-centric advances.
Research limitations/implications
This comparison reviews the managerial frameworks presented in Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hammer and Champy’s book Reengineering the Corporation through the theoretical tenets of leadership.
Practical implications
Employment of Machiavellianism and BPR results in an expendable utilization of followers and employees. Implications abound for modern managers, as the authors emphasize the elements and outcomes which lead to deleterious organizational outcomes.
Social implications
In an analysis of these theories, the authors argue how these strategies undermine employee-centric advances within human relations by embracing these repackaged ideas and concepts.
Originality/value
This research leverages historical perspective to provide a qualitative understanding of the follies of recycled versions of Machiavelli’s ideas. The overall study and inquiry of BPR from a leadership perspective is not robust and leaves antecedents and influences critically unevaluated.
Subject
History,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference62 articles.
1. BPR implementation in Europe: the adaptation of a management concept;New Technology, Work and Employment,2006
2. BPR implementation process: an analysis of key success and failure factors;Business Process Management Journal,1999
3. The reluctant savior of Hewlett-Packard;Forbes,2013
4. Accounting for management and organizational history: strategies and conceptions;Journal of Management History,2021
5. The changing faces of virtue: Plutarch, Machiavelli and Shakespeare’s Coriolanus;Early Modern Literary Studies,2016