Developing political intelligence for making feasible decisions

Author:

Adams Susan M.,Zanzi Alberto

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this research is to propose a model for acquiring political intelligence by describing steps for assessing feasibility that can be used to systematically evaluate a situation. The paper also aims to discuss individual and situational biases to acquiring an accurate political feasibility assessment.Design/methodology/approachA pre‐ and post‐test method was used to compare a sample of novice managers who received training with the feasibility assessment model to experienced, politically savvy managers.FindingsAssessing the political feasibility of a decision is a skill that can be developed to acquire the political intelligence necessary for today's politically‐laden, uncertain competitive environment.Originality/valuePolitical intelligence is at the heart of avoiding political blunders and conflict in organizations. When time and money are spent promoting decisions that are unlikely to succeed, managers can derail their careers from backing initiatives from a declining dominant coalition rather than an emerging one. Yet, these blunders are avoidable. While previous authors agree on the need for political intelligence, little is offered about how to acquire it. This paper offers a model that helps managers acquire the information needed to make politically feasible decisions that develops political intelligence.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference45 articles.

1. Aguinis, H., Simonsen, M.M. and Pierce, C.A. (1998), “Effects of nonverbal behavior on perceptions of power bases”, Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 138 No. 4, pp. 455‐69.

2. Babbie, E. (2001), The Practice of Social Research, 9th ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

3. Block, P. (2000), Flawless Consulting, 2nd ed., Jossey‐Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA.

4. Bolman, L.G. and Deal, T.E. (1997), Reframing Organizations, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA, p. 163.

5. Bonabeau, E. (2003), “Don't trust your gut”, Harvard Business Review, May, pp. 116‐23.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3