Abstract
PurposeAlthough the number of blue-collar industrial workers has been declining, manufacturing jobs continue to have considerable importance, even in technologically advanced economies. This study gives a voice to this often-overlooked group of workers, focusing on the Finnish vehicle industry.Design/methodology/approachThe study assessed how manual workers in automotive manufacturing describe their job pride and how their accounts were related to conceptualizations of work orientation. The data included semi-structured interviews and an open-ended survey question on situations in which the respondents had felt proud of their work. The data were analysed using thematic analysis.FindingsAccording to the results, the respondents had a high level of job pride in general, but the meaning given to this attitude varied considerably, depending on the situation. The study participants' work orientation was a mixture of instrumental and intrinsic traits. However, there were also respondents who did not experience job pride or who had lost it because of the work circumstances.Originality/valueRelatively little research has assessed the importance of job pride in the context of industrial manufacturing. Recognizing job pride in its variety is crucial information for employers who aim to develop working conditions and employee retention.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science
Reference51 articles.
1. The motivational impact of job security, recognition, monetary incentives and training on the job performance of blue-collar employees;South African Journal of Labour Relations,2010
2. Work engagement: current trends;Career Development International,2018
3. Constrained and constructed choices in career: an examination of communication pathways to dignity;Annals of the International Communication Association,2013
4. ‘I'm not mopping the floors, I'm putting a man on the moon’: how NASA leaders enhanced the meaningfulness of work by changing the meaning of work;Administrative Science Quarterly,2018
5. Class, control, and relational indignity: labor process foundations for workplace humiliation, conflict, and shame;American Behavioral Scientist,2014