Segmenting Australian online panellists based on volunteering motivations
Author:
Vocino Andrea,Polonsky Michael,Dolnicar Sara
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to seek to assess whether online commercial panel volunteering can be segmented based on their motivations, using the volunteer functions inventor. The authors also investigate whether segments exist which differ in demographic characteristics.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors survey 484 Australian online panel volunteers using a adapted version of the 30 item of the volunteer function inventory (VFI) scale developed by Clary et al. (1998). Data were analysed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and cluster analysis, as well as ANOVA and χ2 test comparisons of demographics between clusters.
Findings
– CFA verifies that the VFI scale is suitable instrument to gauge online participants’ motivations. Cluster analysis produced a five-cluster solution, where respondents with low motivations overall comprised the largest grouping. Segments are interpreted by assessing the difference between the total sample average and the segment profile. The examination also identifies that the only demographic factor that varies across the five clusters is “respondents” employment status”.
Research limitations/implications
– Future research could explore if differences in segments result in differences in online participation. The high number or respondents with low motivations may explain the relatively high levels of churn that take place within online panels and as a result panel operators would need to continually attract new members. Further research could also investigate whether the levels of motivation change over time and if so what effect such variation would produce on respondents’ retention.
Originality/value
– Research on online panel respondents’ motivation is still limited and investigating online panellists’ motivation as volunteers is very important as it unveils, as in the study herein reported, that alternative types of respondents may be driven by different factors when joining an online panel (or completing a given survey). Recruitment strategies could, therefore, be shaped to suit the motivation of the different segments. By refining the matching between volunteers’ profiles and their motivation, managers could improve how volunteers are recruited, managed and retained.
Reference56 articles.
1. Antin, J.
and
Shaw, A.
(2012), “Social desirability bias and self-reports of motivation: a study of Amazon Mechanical Turk in the US and India”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Austin, TX, 5-10 May, pp. 2925-2934. 2. Baker, R.
,
Blumberg, S.J.
,
Brick, J.M.
,
Couper, M.P.
,
Courtright, M.
,
Dennis, J.M.
and
Zahs, D.
(2010), “Research synthesis AAPOR report on online panels”,
Public Opinion Quarterly
, Vol. 74 No. 4, pp. 711-781. 3. Callegaro, M.
and
DiSogra, C.
(2008), “Computing response metrics for online panels”,
Public Opinion Quarterly
, Vol. 72 No. 5, pp. 1008-1032. 4. Callow, M.
(2004), “Identifying promotional appeals for targeting potential volunteers: an exploratory study on volunteering motives among retirees”,
International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing
, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 261-275. 5. Clary, E.G.
,
Snyder, M.
,
Ridge, R.D.
,
Copeland, J.
,
Stukas, A.A.
,
Haugen, J.
and
Miene, P.
(1998), “Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach”,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
, Vol. 74 No. 1, pp. 516-530.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|