A framework for analysing manufacturing flexibility
Abstract
PurposeThe issue of manufacturing flexibility has been widely discussed in the literature. One major area of focus has been the development of taxonomies for flexibility. This paper aims to review the contributions in this area and to propose a new classification and a framework for analysing flexibility in manufacturing companies.Design/methodology/approachThe study adopts a case study methodology approach. The framework proposed is used to analyse the implementation of flexibility in four UK manufacturing plants in four major industrial sectors: electronics, process, household and general goods and food.FindingsFrom the empirical analysis, various enablers of flexibility are identified. These are classified into three broad sources of flexibility namely fundamental enablers, indirect enablers and generic enablers as well as flexibility avoidance strategies referred to as flexibility evaders.Practical implicationsThe implication is that a mix of flexibility solutions rather than a single solution may be the most appropriate way for delivering flexibility in an organisation. However, the drivers of the need for flexibility have to be correctly identified in order to determine the best solutions for delivering system flexibility.Originality/valueThe development of a refined framework for analysing manufacturing flexibility as well as the identification of various enablers of strategic flexibility are the major contributions of this paper.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference57 articles.
1. Beach, R., Muhlemann, A., Price, D., Paterson, A. and Sharp, J. (2000a), “A review of manufacturing flexibility”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 122 No. 1, pp. 41‐57. 2. Beach, R., Muhlemann, A., Price, D., Paterson, A. and Sharp, J. (2000b), “Manufacturing operations and strategic flexibility: survey and cases”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 7‐30. 3. Beach, R., Muhlemann, A., Price, D., Paterson, A. and Sharp, J. (2001), “The role of qualitative methods in production management research”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 74, pp. 201‐12. 4. Bolwijn, P.T. and Kumpe, T. (1990), “Manufacturing in the 1990s – productivity, flexibility and innovation”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 23 No. 4. 5. Browne, J., Dubois, D., Rathmill, K., Sethi, S.P. and Stecke, K.E. (1984), “Classification of flexible manufacturing systems”, The FMS Magazine.
Cited by
110 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|