Abstract
PurposeAdvancements in responsive manufacturing have been supporting companies over the last few decades. However, manufacturers now operate in a context of continuous uncertainty. This research paper explores a mechanism where companies can “elastically” provision and deprovision their production capacity, to enable them in coping with repeated disruptions. Such a mechanism is facilitated by the imitability and substitutability of production resources.Design/methodology/approachAn inductive study was conducted using Gioia methodology for this theory generation research. Respondents from 20 UK manufacturing companies across multiple industrial sectors reflected on their experience during COVID-19. Resource-based view and resource dependence theory were employed to analyse the manufacturers' use of internal and external production resources.FindingsThe study identifies elastic responses at four operational levels: production-line, factory, company and supply chain. Elastic responses that imposed variable-costs were particularly well-suited for coping with unforeseen disruptions. Further, the imitability and substitutability of manufacturers helped others produce alternate goods during the crisis.Originality/valueWhile uniqueness of production capability helps manufacturers sustain competitive advantage against competitors during stable operations, imitability and substitutability are beneficial during a crisis. Successful manufacturing companies need to combine these two approaches to respond effectively to repeated disruptions in a context of ongoing uncertainties. The theoretical contribution is in characterising responsive manufacturing in terms of resource heterogeneity and resource homogeneity, with elastic resourcing as the underlying mechanism.
Reference71 articles.
1. How the pandemic has accelerated cloud adoption;Forbes,2021
2. Managing the ‘new normal’: the future of operations and supply chain management in unprecedented times;International Journal of Operations and Production Management,2022
3. Andersen, A.-L., Brunoe, T.D. and Nielsen, K. (2015), “Reconfigurable manufacturing on multiple levels: literature review and research directions”, in Umeda, S., Nakano, M., Mizuyama, H., Hibino, N., Kiritsis, D. and von Cieminski, G. (Eds), Advances in Production Management Systems: Innovative Production Management towards Sustainable Growth, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 266-273, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22756-6_33.
4. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage;Journal of Management,1991
5. Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view;Journal of Management,2001