Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine management practices in transferring Japanese kaizen activities to overseas plants. The aim is to provide a greater understanding of organisational capabilities that facilitate an incremental organisation‐wide innovation.Design/methodology/approachCase studies of nine medium‐ and large‐sized Japanese auto‐parts overseas plants in China were conducted. The data were analysed by comparing the successful cases of management practices concerning the transfer of Japanese kaizen activities to overseas plants with unsuccessful ones. Based on the assumption that learning is situated in the context, the concept of communities of practice promoted by Wenger is used as the analytical framework of this study.FindingsThe results of the comparative analysis show some common characteristics of management practices in successful cases: they actively used team‐based rather than individual‐based suggestion schemes; they had human resource practices that emphasised the importance of having workers who could do more than one job and long‐term employment; and the managers of successful cases conducted shop floor visits to check the work processes every day.Originality/valueThis study suggests the necessity for the researchers and practitioners of kaizen to consider a healthy balance between three types of organisational capabilities that encourage workers' self‐initiative, facilitate cross‐functional communication, and discipline workers.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference64 articles.
1. Abo, T. (Ed.) (1994), Hybrid Factory: The Japanese Production System in the United States, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
2. Barney, J. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 99‐120.
3. Bateman, N. (2005), “Sustainability: the elusive element of process improvement”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 261‐76.
4. Bateman, N. and David, A. (2002), “Process improvement programmes: a model for assessing sustainability”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 515‐26.
5. Bateman, N. and Rich, N. (2003), “Companies' perceptions of inhibitors and enablers for process improvement activities”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 185‐99.
Cited by
140 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献