Knowing, learning and acting in health care organizations and services

Author:

Bosio Claudio,Graffigna Guendalina,Scaratti Giuseppe

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to discuss the value of post‐modern psychosocial approaches to studying knowledge and practice construction in health care organizations and settings (HCO&S) and the increasing ability of qualitative research to furnish a deeper, more ecological, and more usable understanding of the social construction of health knowledge and practices.Design/methodology/approachThe argument proposed in the paper is based on a critical literature review conducted on the Psychinfo, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science databases.FindingsRecent years have seen cultural changes in the values and goals of healthcare interventions that are deeply reconfiguring HCO&S. These changes are reframing HCO&S action and are highlighting the importance of understanding and managing not only the “expert context” but also the “lay contexts” of healthcare interventions. In an attempt to deal with these emergent changes (and challenges), HCO&S are taking advantage of new insights matured in the post‐modern turn of organizational analysis. In this frame, qualitative research proves suitable for connecting HCO&S needs and priorities with the new post‐modern paradigm of knowledge‐ and practice‐sharing in organizations.Originality/valueThe paper demonstrates the value of qualitative research in the analysis of HCO&S and casts light on the new research trends and new technical‐methodological options arising in this field.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference98 articles.

1. Alderson, M. (2008), “Work structure in the chronic care setting: possible consequences for nurses’ mental health”, Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 160‐78.

2. Allan, J., Ball, P. and Alston, M. (2008), ‘ “You have to face your mistakes in the street’: the contextual keys that shape health service access and health workers”, Experiences in Rural Areas. Rural and Remote Health, Vol. 8 No. 1, p. 835.

3. Argyris, C. (1992), Organizational Learning, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.

4. Balint, M., Hunt, J., Joyce, D., Marinker, M. and Woodcock, J. (1970), Treatment or Diagnosis, Tavistock Publications, London.

5. Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a new Modernity, Sage, London.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3