Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to determine how best to reduce, reuse and dispose of household waste medicines in the National Health Service (NHS) (UK).
Design/methodology/approach
– Through a combination of literature review and empirical work, this research investigates the existing household waste medicines reverse logistics (RL) system and makes recommendations for improvement by benchmarking it against household waste batteries RL. The viability and feasibility of these recommendations are evaluated through in-depth interviews with healthcare professionals and end user surveys.
Findings
– The batteries RL system appears to be a more structured and effective system with more active engagement from actors/stakeholders in instigating RL practices and for this very reason is an excellent comparator for waste medicines RL practices. Appropriate best practices are recommended to be incorporated into the waste medicines RL system, including recapturing product value, revised processing approaches, system cooperation and enforcement, drivers and motivations and system design and facilitation.
Research limitations/implications
– This study offers academics and professionals an improved insight into the current household waste medicines RL system and provides a step towards reducing an existing gap in this under-researched area. A limitation is that only a small sample of healthcare professionals were involved in subjectively evaluating the feasibility of the recommendations, so the applicability of the recommendations needs to be tested in a wider context and the cost effectiveness of implementing the recommendations needs to be analysed.
Practical implications
– Reducing, reusing and properly disposing of waste medicines contribute to economic sustainability, environmental protection and personal and community safety. The information retrieved from analysing returned medicines can be used to inform prescribing practice so as to reduce unnecessary medicine waste and meet the medicine optimisation agenda.
Originality/value
– This paper advocates learning from best practices in batteries RL to improve the waste medicines RL design and execution and supports the current NHS agenda on medicine waste reduction (DoH, 2012). The recommendations made in the paper not only aim to reduce medicine waste but also to use medicines effectively, placing the emphasis on improving health outcomes.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference74 articles.
1. Alvarez-Gil, M.J.
,
Berrone, P.
,
Husillos, F.J.
and
Lado, N.
(2007), “Reverse logistics, stakeholders’ influence, organisational slack and managers’ posture”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 60 No. 5, pp. 463-473.
2. Andel, T.
(1997), “Reverse logistics: a second chance to profit”, Transportation and Distribution, Vol. 38 No. 7, p. -.
3. Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing
(2012), “New Labels for PBS”, available at: www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-pbs-general-labels.htm, (accessed 9 November, 2012).
4. Autry, C.U.
(2005), “Formalisation of reverse logistics programs: A strategy for managing liberalized returns”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 34, pp. 749-757.
5. Barr, S.
,
Gilg, A.W.
and
Ford, N.J.
(2001), “A conceptual framework for understanding and analyzing attitudes towards household-waste management”, Environment and Planning A, Vol. 33 No. 11, pp. 2025-2048.
Cited by
41 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献