Customer‐focused and service‐focused orientation in organizational structures

Author:

Gebauer Heiko,Kowalkowski Christian

Abstract

PurposeThe paper aims to provide a better understanding of the interrelatedness of customer and service orientations in the organizational structures of capital goods manufacturing companies.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative, multi‐case research design was employed using 36 European capital goods manufacturing companies.FindingsThis article explored four different patterns of how companies move from being product‐focused to service‐focused, and from having an organizational structure that is geographically focused to one that is customer‐focused. The four patterns are termed as follows: emphasizing service orientation, service‐focused organizational structure, emphasizing customer orientation, and customer‐focused organizational structure.Research limitations/implicationsAlthough the study is based on 36 case studies, the external validity (generalizability) of the findings could not be assessed accurately.Practical implicationsThe description of the four organizational approaches offers guidance for managers to restructure their companies towards service and customer orientations.Originality/valueThe article links the relatively independent discussions of service and customer orientations in the context of organizational structures. The four patterns provide a better understanding of how capital goods manufacturers integrate increased customer and service focuses in their organizational structures.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing,Business and International Management

Reference36 articles.

1. Antioco, M., Moenaert, R.K., Lindgreen, A. and Wetzels, M. (2008), “Organizational antecedents to and consequences of service business orientations in manufacturing companies”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 337‐58.

2. Auguste, B.G., Harmon, E.P. and Pandit, V. (2006), “The right service strategies for product companies”, The McKinsey Quarterly, No. 1, pp. 41‐51.

3. Ballantyne, D., Frow, P., Varey, R.J. and Payne, A. (2011), “Value propositions as communication practice: taking a wider view”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 202‐10.

4. Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (2000), Transnational Management: Text, Cases, and Readings in Cross‐Border Management, 3rd ed., McGraw‐Hill, Singapore.

5. Baveja, S.S., Gilbert, J. and Ledingham, D. (2004), “From products to services: why it's not so simple”, Harvard Management Update, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 3‐5.

Cited by 107 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3