Author:
Flegl Martin,Andrade Rosas Luis Antonio
Abstract
Purpose
Many higher education institutions (HEIs) have constructed their internal evaluation systems to secure teaching quality. This paper aims to analyze teaching quality, HEIs use students to evaluate their professors as they have direct contact with the professors during the whole semester. The authorities hope to receive valuable information, which can be used for many administrative purposes. The bias in the evaluation toward professors’ gender and attractiveness has already been proven. However, there is only limited evidence whether students give higher value to teaching quality over the professors’ personality.
Design/methodology/approach
In this paper, the authors go further in the gender-attractiveness evidence and put the evaluation in contrast with professors’ experience, age, etc.
Findings
The results indicate that the effect of experience predominates the effect of gender and in some areas also the effect of age. What is more, a semester in which a course is taken also influences the evaluation as different professors’ abilities are required in teaching in a different semester. On the other hand, the results do not fully confirm the effect of gender on the evaluation.
Originality/value
The results reveal that it is important to consider the course structure to assign professors to the right courses.
Reference56 articles.
1. Best and worst professors: gender patterns in students' choices;Sex Roles,2000
2. How departments of economics should evaluate teaching;American Economic Review ( Review),1999
3. Where class size really matters: class size and student ratings of instructor effectiveness;Economics of Education Review,2008
4. Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors;Economics of Education Review,2014
5. La evaluación de los coordinadores de programas académicos: una propuesta de indicadores. La evaluación educativa desde diversos espacios académicos,2014
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献