Linking customer‐based brand equity with brand market performance: a managerial approach

Author:

Tolba Ahmed H.,Hassan Salah S.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to attempt to bridge a gap in literature by defining and operationalizing specific brand equity constructs, and testing the relationships between customer‐based brand equity and brand market performance. Current literature has focused on building and conceptualizing brand equity, there is no consensus on how it should be measured and what constructs should be included in the measurement process.Design/methodology/approachThis study was conducted in two phases: a consumer‐level analysis; and a brand‐level analysis. A total of 6,410 observations have been identified (sample size consists of 5,598 usable observations). The second phase involved analyzing the data at the aggregate brand level. Analysis included testing hypotheses on the correlations between customer‐based brand equity constructs and brand market performance. finally, detailed market and country‐of‐origin analyses are presented for managerial considerations.FindingsResults from the consumer dataset have been averaged by brand (a total of 17 brands covering 76 percent and 75 percent of market shares in both economy and luxury markets). At the consumer‐level, structural equation modeling was conducted to test research hypotheses. Results varied according to consumer usage. Attitudinal loyalty and satisfaction were found the strongest predictors of brand preference and intention to purchase. At the aggregate brand level, correlation analyses supported the hypothesis that customer‐based brand equity constructs are correlated with brand market performance.Practical implicationsAnalyses at the consumer and brand levels revealed interesting results about the US automotive market and suggested important managerial considerations. Specific recommendations are offered in order to help companies prioritize their resource utilization and improve their performance in the market.Originality/valueThis study offers a new model that links customer‐based brand equity with brand market performance. It advances both academic and practical findings, and opens the door for new streams of research that link academic models with practical applications. It advances specific practical recommendations to companies and at the same time offers a reliable and valid academic model that could be applied on other industries and countries.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Marketing

Reference43 articles.

1. Aaker, D. (1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, Free Press, New York, NY.

2. Aaker, D. (1996), “Measuring brand equity across products and markets”, California Management Review, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 102‐20.

3. Achenbaum, A. (1968), “Relevant measures of consumer attitudes”, Proceedings of the ESOMAR Congress, Opatija.

4. Agarwal, M.K. and Rao, V.R. (1996), “An empirical comparison of consumer‐based measures of brand equity”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 237‐47.

5. Assael, H. and Day, R. (1968), “Attitudes and awareness as predictors of market share”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 8 No. 4.

Cited by 60 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A holistic empirical approach to marketing activities and performance interaction in banking industry: the mediating role of customer-based brand equity;Business Process Management Journal;2024-09-13

2. Centrality of sensory attributes in brand extension evaluations;Journal of Consumer Marketing;2024-06-07

3. Customer-Based Brand Equity Drivers: A Leading Brand of Beer in Estonia;Administrative Sciences;2024-03-22

4. Antecedents of Chinese Consumers’ Purchase Intentions Toward Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs);Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies;2024

5. Agent Theory Based Multiple Case Study of Government CIO on IT Procurement;2023 IEEE 15th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM);2023-11-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3