Faculty adoption and usage behaviour of open access scholarly communication in health science universities

Author:

Tandi Lwoga Edda,Questier Frederik

Abstract

Purpose – The study seeks to investigate factors that affect the adoption and use of open access in Tanzanian health sciences universities. Design/methodology/approach – Based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey, 415 faculty members were selected through a stratified random sampling from a population of 679 in all eight health sciences universities in Tanzania. The response rate was 71.1 per cent. Findings – Based on the social exchange theory (SET), and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), the study developed a model suitable for assessing open access adoption and usage in academic institutions. The study found that facilitating conditions, extrinsic benefits (professional recognition), behavioural intention and individual characteristics (professional rank, technical skills and number of publications) predicted actual usage of open access. Other factors related to contextual factors (attitude, and open access culture), and extrinsic benefits (academic reward, accessibility and preservation) determined behavioural intention to use open access. Fear to violate publisher's copyright policies and effort expectancy however de-motivated faculty to adopt open access, while copyright concerns inhibited faculty's actual usage of open access. Originality/value – This is the first comprehensive study focusing on the health sciences faculty's open access adoption and usage behaviour in Africa, and Tanzania in particular, and reveals findings that are useful for planning and implementing open access initiatives in other institutions with similar conditions.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference35 articles.

1. Abrizah, A. (2009), “The cautious faculty: their awareness and attitudes towards institutional repositories”, Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 17-37.

2. Abrizah, A. (2012), “Populating institutional repository: faculty's contribution and roles of librarians”, BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 27-51.

3. Blau, P. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, Wiley Interscience Publication, New York, NY.

4. Casey, A. (2012), “Does tenure matter? Factors influencing faculty contributions to institutional repositories”, Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1-11.

5. Covey, D. (2009), “Self-archiving journal articles: a case study of faculty practice and missed opportunity”, Portal: Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 223-251.

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3