How “space” and “place” contribute to occupational aspirations as a value-constituting practice for working-class males
Author:
Stahl Garth,Baars Sam
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to consider how working-class boys constitute themselves as subjects of “value” through a close examination of their occupational aspirations. The authors consider two significant influences on the aspirations of these young men: “space” and “place”; and neoliberal discourses which privilege a particular concept of individualized personhood. Contending with neoliberal conceptions of personhood and aspiration (that are primarily competitive, economic, and status based), working-class and working-poor young men either align themselves with the “entrepreneurial” or “aspirational” self or face the label of “low aspirations”.
Design/methodology/approach
– Employing space and place as conceptual lenses allows for a nuanced understanding of how aspirations are formed (and reformed) according to immediate locale. To explore the identity negotiations surrounding the occupational aspirations of working-class males, the authors draw on two qualitative research studies in deprived neighbourhoods located in South Manchester and South London.
Findings
– Based on the evidence as well as the wider research concerning working-class males and occupational aspirations, the authors argue that aspirations are formed in a contested space between traditional, localized, classed identities and a broader neoliberal conception of the “aspirational” rootless self.
Research limitations/implications
– This study focuses on aspiration formation in two specific neighbourhoods, and caution should be taken when generalizing the findings beyond these area contexts.
Originality/value
– This study problematizes the literature generated by government bodies and educational institutions regarding working-class youth as having a “poverty of aspirations”. Additionally, value lies in the cross-reference of two specific geographic areas using the conceptual lens of space and place.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Education,Life-span and Life-course Studies
Reference68 articles.
1. Abrams, F.
(2010),
Learning to Fail: How Society Lets Young People Down
, Routledge, Abingdon. 2. Agnew, J.
and
Smith, M.
(2011), “Space and place”, in
Agnew, J.
and
Livingstone, D.
(Eds),
The Sage Handbook of Geographical Knowledge
, Sage, London, pp. 316-331. 3. Archer, L.
,
Hollingworth, S.
and
Mendick, H.
(2010),
Urban Youth and Schooling: The Experiences and Identities of Educationally “At Risk” Young People
, Open University Press, Berkshire. 4. Archer, L.
and
Yamashita, H.
(2003), “Theorising inner-city masculinities: ‘race’, class, gender, and education”,
Gender and Education
, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 115-132. 5. Arnot, M.
(1985), “How shall we educate our sons?”, in
Deem, R.
(Ed.),
Co-Education Reconsidered
, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, pp. 37-57.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Constructing ‘Micro-territories of the local’: young people making place in regional Australia;Australian Geographer;2022-07-03 2. Conclusions;Pedagogic Practices, Student Engagement and Equity in Chinese as a Foreign Language Education;2021-11-23 3. Pedagogical perspectives from students and the classroom teacher;Pedagogic Practices, Student Engagement and Equity in Chinese as a Foreign Language Education;2021-11-23 4. Dominic’s Story: The “Pedagogy of Discomfort” and Learner Identity in Flux;Journal of Language, Identity & Education;2021-11-03 5. Boys, science and literacy: place-based masculinities, reading practices and the ‘science literate boy’;Research Papers in Education;2021-09-16
|
|