Making it tangible: hybrid card sorting within qualitative interviews

Author:

Conrad Lettie Y.ORCID,Tucker Virginia M.

Abstract

PurposeQualitative researchers and information practitioners often investigate questions that probe the underlying mental models, nuanced perspectives, emotions and experiences of their target populations. The in-depth qualitative interview is a dominant method for such investigations and the purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how incorporating hybrid card-sorting activities into interviews can enable deeper participant reflections and generate rich data sets to increase understanding.Design/methodology/approachFollowing a review of relevant literature, the case illustration presented is a grounded theory study into the student-researcher information experience with personal academic information management. This study uses hybrid card sorting within in-depth, semi-structured interviews, a unique adaptation that extends multi-disciplinary awareness of the benefits of card-sort exercises for qualitative research.FindingsEmerging from diverse fields, ranging from computer science, engineering, psychology and human–computer interaction, card sorting seeks to illuminate how participants understand and organise concepts. The case illustration draws largely on methods used in interaction design and information architecture. Using either open or fixed designs, or hybrid variations, card-sort activities can make abstract concepts more tangible for participants, offering investigators a new approach to interview questions with the aid of this interactive, object-based technique.Originality/valueOpening with a comprehensive review of card-sort studies, the authors present an information experience case illustration that demonstrates the rich data generated by hybrid card sorting within qualitative interviews, or interactive interviews. This is followed by discussion of the types of research questions that may benefit from this original method.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference66 articles.

1. ANSI/NISO (2010), “Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies”, American National Standards Institute/National Institute of Standards Organizations Z39.19, available at: www.niso.org/publications/ansiniso-z3919-2005-r2010-guidelines-construction-format-and-management-monolingual

2. Children as architects of web directories: an exploratory study;Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2007

3. Baxter, K., Courage, C. and Crane, K. (2015), “Card sorting”, Understanding your Users, 2nd ed., Elsevier, Waltham, MA, pp. 302-337.

4. The use of visual card sorting technique to study managers’ belief structure – an international comparative study;Journal of Managerial Psychology,2000

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Developing scales for assessing metaverse characteristics and testing their utility;Computers in Human Behavior Reports;2024-03

2. Planning for participants’ varying needs and abilities in qualitative research;Physical Review Physics Education Research;2023-10-12

3. A Systematic Review of User Mental Models on Applications Sustainability;International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology;2023-09-21

4. Web Usability Practice at ARL Academic Libraries;portal: Libraries and the Academy;2023-07

5. Communicating about Extreme Heat: Results from Card Sorting and Think-Aloud Interviews with Experts from Differing Domains;Weather, Climate, and Society;2023-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3