Author:
Spiranec Sonja,Banek Zorica Mihaela,Kos Denis
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to make a contribution to the theoretical and pragmatic positioning of critical information literacy by interpreting it in the light of epistemological shifts brought about by Web 2.0. Epistemological shifts are elaborated from educational and institutional perspectives as well as from that of scientific research.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper brings a theoretical analysis drawing on relevant literature for the purpose of identifying the grounds for the mapping of concepts associated with critical information literacy and participatory information environments. Based on descriptive analysis, the paper clarifies distinctions between/participatory/and /information bank/environments and identifies correlations existing between CIL and participatory information environments.
Findings
– There are conceptual disagreements between IL as it was defined and perceived by Zurkowski and how it has to be perceived in the context of contemporary participatory information environments. Current environments are congruent with the core principles and values of critical information literacy and call for the reshaping of IL by introducing into it critical and transformative elements. Not technological aspects of Web 2.0 are crucial in this regard, but epistemological shifts.
Practical implications
– Owing to the fact that Web 2.0 and critical information literacy share many similar features, information environments based on participatory technologies and services provide a context ideally suited for the application of the principles of CIL.
Social implications
– The paper highlights the correlating dimensions between Web 2.0 and critical information literacy and proposes that Web 2.0 makes necessary a more critical outlook on information literacy.
Originality/value
– The paper highlights the correlating dimensions between Web 2.0 and critical information literacy, indicates specific differences between information literacy and critical information literacy and closes with the conclusion that Web 2.0 makes necessary a more critical outlook on information literacy.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference69 articles.
1. Allard, S.
(2009), “Library managers and information in World 2.0”,
Library Management
, Vol. 30 Nos 1/2, pp. 57-68.
2. American Library Association
(1989), “Presidential commission on information literacy: final report”, available at: www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential.cfm (accessed 17 March 2015).
3. Andersen, J.
(2006), “The public sphere and discursive activities: information literacy as sociopolitical skills”,
Journal of Documentation
, Vol. 62 No. 2, pp. 213-228.
4. Andretta, S.
(2006), “Information literacy: challenges of implementation”,
Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences
, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-6.
5. Association of College and Research Libraries
(2000), “Information literacy competency standards for higher education”, available at: www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/standards.pdf (accessed 17 March 2015).
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献