Information Literacy in participatory environments

Author:

Spiranec Sonja,Banek Zorica Mihaela,Kos Denis

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to make a contribution to the theoretical and pragmatic positioning of critical information literacy by interpreting it in the light of epistemological shifts brought about by Web 2.0. Epistemological shifts are elaborated from educational and institutional perspectives as well as from that of scientific research. Design/methodology/approach – This paper brings a theoretical analysis drawing on relevant literature for the purpose of identifying the grounds for the mapping of concepts associated with critical information literacy and participatory information environments. Based on descriptive analysis, the paper clarifies distinctions between/participatory/and /information bank/environments and identifies correlations existing between CIL and participatory information environments. Findings – There are conceptual disagreements between IL as it was defined and perceived by Zurkowski and how it has to be perceived in the context of contemporary participatory information environments. Current environments are congruent with the core principles and values of critical information literacy and call for the reshaping of IL by introducing into it critical and transformative elements. Not technological aspects of Web 2.0 are crucial in this regard, but epistemological shifts. Practical implications – Owing to the fact that Web 2.0 and critical information literacy share many similar features, information environments based on participatory technologies and services provide a context ideally suited for the application of the principles of CIL. Social implications – The paper highlights the correlating dimensions between Web 2.0 and critical information literacy and proposes that Web 2.0 makes necessary a more critical outlook on information literacy. Originality/value – The paper highlights the correlating dimensions between Web 2.0 and critical information literacy, indicates specific differences between information literacy and critical information literacy and closes with the conclusion that Web 2.0 makes necessary a more critical outlook on information literacy.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference69 articles.

1. Allard, S. (2009), “Library managers and information in World 2.0”, Library Management , Vol. 30 Nos 1/2, pp. 57-68.

2. American Library Association (1989), “Presidential commission on information literacy: final report”, available at: www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential.cfm (accessed 17 March 2015).

3. Andersen, J. (2006), “The public sphere and discursive activities: information literacy as sociopolitical skills”, Journal of Documentation , Vol. 62 No. 2, pp. 213-228.

4. Andretta, S. (2006), “Information literacy: challenges of implementation”, Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences , Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-6.

5. Association of College and Research Libraries (2000), “Information literacy competency standards for higher education”, available at: www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/standards.pdf (accessed 17 March 2015).

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Connected Learning: Opportunities and Implications for Twenty-First-Century Education;Connected Learning: Origins, Opportunities, and Perspectives of Contemporary Educational Design;2024

2. Vernetzes Lernen: Chancen und Auswirkungen für die Bildung im 21. Jahrhundert;Vernetztes Lernen: Ursprünge, Chancen und Perspektiven im aktuellen Bildungsdesign;2024

3. Information literacy skills and competencies of nursing students at Kamuzu University of Health Sciences in Malawi;S AFR J LIBR INF;2023

4. Infocommunicative literacy: Conceptual structure and applications;Journal of Librarianship and Information Science;2022-05-07

5. Por uma estrutura conceitual e metodológica para a promoção de competências infocomunicacionais;Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação;2022-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3