Author:
Wang Catherine L.,Ahmed Pervaiz K.
Abstract
Organizational forms have evolved over the decades. Organizational design reflects the systems view, which considers that structure consists of both hard and soft components, and is the superior composition of relationship between organizational elements. Structural dimensions are traditionally examined along three dimensions of formal relationship: hierarchical, functional, and the dimension of inclusion and centrality, underlining two prime types of structure: mechanistic and organic organizations. However, the knowledge economy makes new demands on organizational structuring based on processes. Informal structure better depicts actual organizational activities and reflects dynamic interaction that is critical to knowledge creation. This conceptual paper incorporates informal structure as an important dimension and further elaborates organizational structuring at a higher level: trust‐based relationship, externally‐oriented interactive relationship, and emotionally‐inclusive relationship; and their importance in the attainment of organizational success in the knowledge economy.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference55 articles.
1. Ackoff, R.L. (1994), The Democratic Corporation, Oxford University Press, London.
2. Ahmed, P.K. (1998), “Culture and climate for innovation”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 30‐43.
3. Bierly, P.E., Kessler, E.H. and Christensen, E.W. (2000), “Organisational learning, knowledge and wisdom”, Journal of Organisational Change Management, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 595‐618.
4. Bunge, M. (1979), A World of Systems, Reidel, Dordrecht.
5. Bunge, M. (1985a), Philosophy of Science and Technology, Part I, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Cited by
56 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献