Author:
Amiruddin Rozita,Aman Aini,Sofiah ,Hamzah Noradiva,Maelah Ruhanita
Abstract
PurposeA shared service (SS) arrangement involves an intra‐firm interrelationship, since the SS centre (SSC), operated as an independent business unit, provides services to clients who are other independent business units in the same company group. The purpose of this study is to provide an understanding of risks and controls used in mitigating SS risks.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopts a qualitative approach using a case study of a SSC in a bank group in Malaysia. The risks and control framework developed by Das and Teng was used to analyse the appropriate control mechanisms for mitigating internal outsourcing risks, namely relational risk and performance risk.FindingsThe main relational risk identified is the possibility of opportunistic behaviour. However, this risk could be mitigated through social control especially when both parties share norms and values. Performance risks in SSC are mainly related to unsatisfactory services in terms of incomplete information, system errors and human mistakes. These risks could be mitigated using either behaviour control or output control. Behaviour control can be exercised through performance reporting, while output control can be achieved through key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLA).Research limitations/implicationsThis study is limited to a single case study of a SSC with a certain type of arrangement and discusses business process outsourcing (BPO) in general. Future research may examine cases with other SS arrangements, detailed examination of each BPO and incorporate multi‐perspective views from both SSC and their clients. Issues concerning changes in control in the evolving situation of SSC and bargaining power and trust in mitigating SSC risks are also worth exploring.Practical implicationsThe study's findings enable practitioners to draw insights to develop effective control strategies to mitigate risks in intra‐organizational relationships such as SSC.Originality/valueThe paper adds to our knowledge of control mechanisms for mitigating risks in the SS relationship, which is a relatively new concept in the literature.
Subject
Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference50 articles.
1. Aksin, O.Z. and Masini, A. (2008), “Effective strategies for internal outsourcing and offshoring of business services: an empirical investigation”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 239‐56.
2. Aman, A. and Engku Abdul Rahman, E.Z. (2011), “Managing relational risks in accounting outsourcing: experiences of small firm”, World Applied Sciences Journal, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 56‐62.
3. Aman, A., Hamzah, N., Amiruddin, R. and Maelah, R. (2012), “Transaction costs in finance and accounting offshore outsourcing: a case of Malaysia”, Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 72‐88.
4. Aron, R. and Singh, J.V. (2005), “Getting offshoring right”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 83 No. 12, pp. 135‐43.
5. Aron, R., Clemons, E.K. and Reddi, S. (2005), “Just right outsourcing: understanding and managing risk”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 37‐55.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献