How should firms deal with counterfeiting?

Author:

Hoecht Andreas,Trott Paul

Abstract

Purpose – The production and sale of counterfeit products is big business in the international economy. Nowhere is this more evident than in China. This paper aims to review the anti-counterfeiting strategies that have been identified in the literature on counterfeiting. Design/methodology/approach – The paper takes the form of a literature review. Findings – This paper reviews 11 anti-counterfeiting strategies that have been suggested by relevant literature and has identified some of the success conditions. It also finds that firms should seek to take a longer-term view and to protect their technology-based competitive advantage. This is already happening: Japanese blue chip companies have begun to relocate sensitive R&D and high-tech manufacturing away from risky locations and back to Japan. Research limitations/implications – The paper shows that the dominant legal enforcement (perspective) approach has been of limited success and explains the reasons for its failure. Practical implications – The paper concludes that anti-counterfeiting strategies should be seen as complementary rather than as mutually exclusive and that in the long run, as countries get more technologically advanced, governments will develop a strong self-interest in tackling the counterfeit problem themselves. Originality/value – The paper provides a systematic discussion of alternative anti-counterfeiting strategies that have been suggested by the literature and explores their success conditions in some detail.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference106 articles.

1. Aaker, D.A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity, The Free Press, New York, NY.

2. ACG (2007), “The anti-counterfeiting group: campaigning against the trade in fakes”, available at: www.a-cg.com/ (accessed September 2007).

3. Albers-Miller, N.D. (1999), “Consumer misbehavior: why people buy illicit goods”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 273-287.

4. Anderson, J. (1999), “The campaign against dangerous counterfeit goods”, ICPR, Vol. 476-477, pp. 56-59.

5. Bale, H. (1998), “The conflict between parallel trade and product access and innovation: the case of pharmaceuticals”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 1, pp. 637-653.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3