The impact of users’ verbal/imagery cognitive styles on their Web search behavior

Author:

Hariri Nadjla,Asadi Maryam,Mansourian Yazdan

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of verbal-imagery cognitive styles of information searching behavior of users in using the Web. Design/methodology/approach – In all, 44 participants were recruited for this study. The participants’ cognitive styles were measured by using Riding's Cognitive Style Analysis test. Three search tasks were designed based on Kim's search task definitions. Moreover, an individual lab session was arranged and then participants’ memos were analyzed using content analysis. Findings – In all, 48 strategies in four categories of behaviors in searching the Web were identified. There were associations between users’ cognitive styles and their information searching behavior. The participants’ selection of the search initiation behaviors varied, so that imagers suffered from more varied initial behavior than verbalizers. The verbalizers tended to search in a narrow area, then broadening the area and following structured navigation and reading behavior to process information, while imagers tended to search in a general area, then narrowing down the search and adopting mixed navigational styles and mixed behaviors to process information. This study revealed that there was a difference in search performance of verbalizers and imagers descriptively, as verbalizers spent more time compared to imagers and imagers visited more nodes than verbalizers for the tasks completion. In addition, the task was an important variable influencing the search performance. Based on the key findings (search initiation behaviors, formulating search queries, navigational behaviors, information processing behaviors), a conceptual pattern of Web searching and cognitive styles is presented. Research limitations/implications – The study provides a new understanding of Web users’ information search behavior based on cognitive styles which contributes to the theoretical basis of Web search research. It also raises various questions within the context of user studies Originality/value – The paper adopted a mixed approach in the area of information searching on the Web. A valuable contribution lies in the methods developed.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference71 articles.

1. Beigi, A. (2002), “Normalization of Riding's cognitive styles analysis test”, unpublished MSc dissertation, Kharazmi University, Iran.

2. Byström, K and Järvelin, K. (1995), “Task complexity affects information-seeking and use”, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 191-213.

3. Cassidy, S. (2004), “Learning styles: an overview of theories models and measures”, Educational Psychology, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 19-444.

4. Chen, C. and Lin, H. (1998), “The effect of navigation map types and cognitive styles on learners’ performance in a computer networked”, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Vol. 7 Nos 2/3, pp. 151-176.

5. Coffield, F. , Moseley, D. , Hall, E. and Ecclestone, K. (2004), “Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review”, LSRC reference, Learning Skills Research Centre, London, available at: http://lerenleren.nu/bronnen/Learning%20styles%20by%20Coffield%20e.a..pdf (accessed October 4, 2012).

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3