Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to analyze public trust during the aftermath of technological and hybrid natural-technological/natech disasters – Hurricane Katrina (2005) and the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear meltdown in Japan (2011). The work identifies common themes, actions and inactivity that can lead to citizens distrusting the government after disasters.
Design/methodology/approach
– News reports from the two areas leading newspapers formed the body of the Hurricane Katrina and the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear meltdown case studies. Of key interest were emerging themes of trust and/or distrust during the immediate impact phase of the disaster in addition to government failures and social breakdowns resulting in a loss of trust in government institutions and individual leaders.
Findings
– The series of examples illustrate how specific action or in-action by local and federal governments served as a catalyst for a loss of trust in government institutions and individual leaders in government while proposing potential strategies to help public leaders reduce distrust during times of crisis.
Research limitations/implications
– The two limitations were the use of only newspapers and the passage of a new law in 2013, the “Specially Designated Secrets Protection Law,” designed to limit news reporting of the press in Japan on the issue of nuclear radiation exposure of the general public in Japan, some of the new data are not available.
Practical implications
– The research concludes by offering specific ways to regain trust after a perception of failure during pre- and post-disaster management in the age of mega disasters. The paper lists several recommendations that can be practically implemented to develop a culture of transparent communication, civic engagement in planning processes and inspire trust among stakeholders.
Originality/value
– While the paper identifies barriers to establishing trust among government agencies, the citizenry and private industry, it seeks to help inform policy frameworks regarding the importance of the government’s ability to sustain a strong sense of trust that engenders civic participation in preserving or regaining trust in the aftermath of disasters.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science
Reference97 articles.
1. Adeola, F.O.
and
Picou, S.J.
(2012), “Race, social capital, and the health impacts of Katrina: evidence from the Louisiana and Mississippi Gulf Coast”,
Human Ecology Review
, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 10-24.
2. Aoki, M.
(2012), “Mothers first to shed food-safety complacency”, The Japan Today, available at: www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2012/01/04/national/mothers-first-to-shed-food-safety-complacency/#.VzXZkiGHpGh (accessed June 1, 2015).
3. Atkins, D.
and
Moy, E.M.
(2005), “Left behind: the legacy of Hurricane Katrina: Hurricane Katrina puts the health effects of poverty and race in plain view”,
British Medical Journal
, Vol. 331 No. 7522, pp. 916-918.
4. Barnes, M.
,
Newman, J.
,
Knops, A.
and
Sullivan, H.
(2003), “Constituting ‘the public’ in public participation”,
Journal of Public Administration
, Vol. 81 No. 2, pp. 379-399.
5. Baum, A.
and
Fleming, I.
(1993), “Implication of psychological research on stress and technological accidents”,
American Psychologist
, Vol. 48 No. 6, pp. 665-672.
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献