Abstract
PurposeIn today's volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous world, organizations deal with fragmented publics in contested public spheres. At the core, public opinion is not so much divided by issues per se but by deeply rooted moral concerns. Hence, while normative perspectives on morality prevail in strategic communication research, understanding the moral motives of stakeholders and publics from a descriptive standpoint becomes vital. In this light, the present conceptual paper discusses the implications of moral foundations theory (MFT), as an influential evolutionary-anthropological approach to morality, for strategic communication research and practice.Design/methodology/approachAdopting micro-, meso- and macro-perspectives, MFT's potential contribution to strategic communication research is explored regarding three foci: (1) moral framing, (2) narratives and (3) public discourse dynamics.FindingsThe paper concludes that frames and more complex narratives in strategic communication allude to MFT's five foundations – care, fairness, loyalty, authority and purity – in diverse ways and are given different readings by stakeholders and publics. Building on MFT, novel empirical tools are available to access and understand the complex web of moral meaning infused in public discourses.Originality/valueFor the first time, MFT is discussed systematically and in detail in the context of strategic communication research. The theory contributes to deepening the understanding of the conditions, e.g. for issues management and strategic mobilization. On broader view, this paper adds to the discussion on evolutionary perspectives in strategic communication research.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Communication
Reference49 articles.
1. Reducing anger and blame: the role of the morality news frame and crisis response strategy;Public Relations Review,2011
2. Counter-framing: implications for public relations;Public Relations Inquiry,2018
3. Fighting climate change: the role of norms, preferences, and moral values,2021
4. Bowen, S.A. (2010), “The nature of good in public relations: what should be its normative ethic?”, in Heath, R.L. (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 569-584.
5. Contingent organization-public relationship (COPR) matters: reconciling the contingency theory of accommodation into the relationship management paradigm;Journal of Public Relations Research,2020