Author:
Sayman Serdar,J. Hoch Stephen
Abstract
Purpose
– A loyalty program might influence buyer behavior in several ways. Prior research offers evidence that buyers might increase the frequency of purchases and volume per occasion in a loyalty program; however, the effect on buyers' price tolerance has not been studied before. The aim of this paper is to examine buyers' willingness to pay a price premium for a firm offering a loyalty program reward.
Design/methodology/approach
– An analytical model of dynamic consumer choice is developed, where one of the two selling firms offers a reward for a certain number of purchases. The maximum price premium that a normatively rational buyer should be willing to pay at each level of accumulated purchases is obtained. A price tolerance in controlled settings is obtained and these are compared with normative solutions.
Findings
– Analytically, it is shown that the maximum price premium increases as purchases are accumulated; and the exact solutions can be found, given the price distributions and program design parameters. In the empirical studies it is found that individuals' maximum premiums are less than the normative levels. On the other hand, as buyers accumulate purchases from the reward offering firm, and get closer to the reward, maximum premiums paid increase – particularly when the reward is immediate.
Originality/value
– This paper contributes to the loyalty programs literature by examining the price premium, or switching barrier, aspect of buyer response. Furthermore, the paper not only models and solves the normative strategy, but also obtains actual price tolerance in laboratory settings.
Reference44 articles.
1. Ainslie, G.
(1975), “Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 82 No. 4, pp. 463-496.
2. American Airlines Newsroom
(2011), available at: www.aa.com/aa/i18nForward.do?p=/amrcorp/newsroom/aadvantage.jsp.
3. Arnesen, D.W.
,
Patrick Fleenor, C.
and
Toh, R.S.
(1997), “The ethical dimensions of airline frequent flier programs”, Business Horizons, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 47-56.
4. Balistreri, E.
,
McClelland, G.
,
Poe,, G.
and
Schulze, W.
(2001), “Can hypothetical questions reveal true values? A laboratory comparison of dichotomous choice and open-ended contingent values with auction values”, Journal Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 275-292.
5. Banerjee, A.
and
Summers, L.H.
(1987), “On frequent-flyer programs and other frequency-inducing economic arrangements”, Discussion Paper No. 1337, Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献