Decision making in human resources standard practices and change management innovation initiatives: the common destiny of being affected by biases

Author:

Palmucci Dario NataleORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis work aims to shed light on the cognitive biases that may have an influence on the strategic decision-making process, with a particular focus on those impacting both human resources (HR) standard activities within organizations and new innovative change management initiatives critical for them to survive.Design/methodology/approachThis is a conceptual paper based on a literature review on cognitive biases and managerial decision-making. The conceptual approach is employed to outline how subjective cognitive barriers can undermine managerial decisions and, in particular, the objectivity of HR practices and change management initiatives.FindingsThe discussion emphasizes that cognitive biases are ever-present elements in the decision-making process of professionals, and they influence several areas of management including HR and change management.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations of the study concern the method adopted, as it is conceptual. The implications of the paper are relevant for supervisors and employees working in the HR and innovation/R&D departments in order to create awareness within the organizational contexts and limit the negative influence of these cognitive barriers during their daily activities.Originality/valueThe research contributes to the knowledge on HR management and decision-making process by combining literature findings with practical examples and tips suggesting how to avoid biases in the decision-making process regarding HR and change management.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference69 articles.

1. Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: a systematic literature review;Management Decision,2020

2. Forming impressions of personality;The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,1946

3. Pygmalion, galatea, and the golem: investigations of biased and unbiased teachers;Journal of Educational Psychology,1982

4. The measurement of individual differences in cognitive biases: a review and improvement;Frontiers in Psychology,2021

5. Human resource management-practices, performance and strategy in the Italian hotel industry;World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development,2012

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Base Rate Neglect Bias: Can it be Observed in HRM Decisions and Can it be Decreased by Visually Presenting the Base Rates in HRM Decisions?;International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE);2024-04-24

2. Design of Human Resources Management Decision System Based on Multi-Agent System and Reinforcement Learning Algorithm;Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Cyber Security, Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy;2024-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3