Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to paper investigates whether different perceptions exist with regard to diversity management within an organisation. Additionally, if such differences exist, what contextual factors influence these perceptions?
Design/methodology/approach
The approach of this study is based on inductive and interpretative case research, which aims to compare diverse perceptions in two different organisational units of a company. For this purpose, 30 semi-structured interviews were conducted.
Findings
The findings in this paper highlight the importance of contexts in the study of diversity management. That is, contexts such as workforce composition and power (e.g. organisational status) in an organisation as well as the social environment’s impact on social identity processes, which results in discrepant focusses on and recognition of diversity management within the same organisation.
Research limitations/implications
This study contributes to research on a more nuanced approach to diversity by proposing an importance of contexts for the process of social identity and further perceptual discrepancy.
Practical implications
Qualitative research on and findings about perceptual discrepancy help to close the gap between the practice and rhetoric of diversity management.
Originality/value
Departing from extant empirical research on diversity at the workplace, which relies predominantly on quantitative methods, a qualitative design of this study allows a refinement of previous findings. Also, this paper provides deeper insight into the sense-making process, resulting in different diversity perceptions by different employees according to their work and social environments or contexts.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations
Reference63 articles.
1. Social identity theory and the organization;The Academy of Management Review,1989
2. Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions;Journal of Management,2008
3. Target practices: an organizational impression management approach to attracting minority and female job applicants;Personnel Psychology,2006
4. Bacouel-Jentjens, S. and Castro-Christiansen, L. (2016), “Diversity management in Denmark and in France: a comparative approach”, in Klarsfeld, A. et al. (Eds), Research Handbook of International and Comparative Perspectives on Diversity Management, Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 45-68.
5. Bradshaw, P. and Wicks, D. (2000), “The experiences of white women on corporate boards in Canada”, in Burke, R.J. and Mattis, M.C. (Eds), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors, Issues in Business Ethics, Vol. 14, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 197-212.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献