Getting to know you: reflections on a specialist independent mental health advocacy service for Bexley and Bromley residents in forensic settings

Author:

Palmer David,Nixon John,Reynolds Simone,Panayiotou Anastasia,Palmer Antje,Meyerowitz Ruth

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to discuss an audit evaluation of a specialist independent mental health advocacy service based in the London Borough of Bexley.Design/methodology/approachThe audit included qualitative interviews with ten service users, resident in two specialist forensic mental health and challenging behaviour units. All participants were long‐term in‐patient residents. A number of ethical issues required consideration, in particular respondent confidentiality and informed consent.FindingsFindings indicate that the service's approach, which combines formal advocacy methods with a proactive ethos, had a positive impact on engagement. The importance of trust in the relationships between advocates and service users was also highlighted by the study and is discussed here. The audit also indicates a significant increase in self‐reported wellbeing, self‐efficacy and empowerment for participants. Given that enhancing personal empowerment is one of the primary objectives of the advocacy service, the positive wellbeing outcomes reported are encouraging.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper relies on a small number of individuals. There is no attempt to claim representativeness or endeavour to generalise from the findings.Originality/valueIt is recommended that, in the absence of a comprehensive national evidence base, the advocacy needs of patients in forensic and specialist settings be constantly reviewed. Additionally, further action research, to inform educational material and guides for advocacy in specialist settings, may be beneficial and timely.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference19 articles.

1. Advocacy Across London (2002), The Advocacy Charter, Advocacy Across London, London.

2. Bowling, A. (2002), Research Methods in Health, 2nd ed., Open University, Guidlford.

3. Brown, P., Calnan, M., Scrivener, A. and Szmukler, G. (2009), “Trust in Mental Health Services: a neglected concept”, Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 449‐58.

4. Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994), “Introduction: entering the field of qualitative research”, in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 1‐17.

5. Department of Health (2011), No Health Without Mental Health: A Cross‐government Mental Health Outcomes Strategy for People of All Ages – Impact Assessment, Government Publications, London.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3