Author:
Alleyne Emma,Pritchard Elizabeth
Abstract
Purpose
– Research has demonstrated that girls are involved in gangs as members and affiliates. However, the psychological processes related to female gang membership has, to date, not been examined using a rigorous comparative design. The purpose of this paper is to assess whether female gang members exhibit distinct psychological and behavioral features when compared to female non-gang youth.
Design/methodology/approach
– In total, 117 female students were recruited from all-girls’ secondary schools in London, UK. Gang members (n=22; identified using the Eurogang definition) were compared to non-gang youth (n=95) on self-report measures of criminal activity, sexual activity, self-esteem, anti-authority attitudes, their perceived importance of social status, and hypermasculinity, using a series of MANCOVAs.
Findings
– The results found that gang members reported significantly more criminal activity, sexual activity, unwanted sexual contact, and held more anti-authority attitudes when compared to their non-gang counterparts.
Practical implications
– These findings support Pyrooz et al.’s (2014) findings that gang membership contributes to the theoretical conceptualization of the victim-offender overlap. Practitioners need to take this into consideration when working with female gang members.
Originality/value
– There is very little research that explicitly examines the characteristics of female gang members with suitable comparison groups. This study adds to the growing literature on female involvement in gangs and highlights the distinct psychological and behavioral characteristics of this group. In summary, these findings support the notion that female gang members are both at risk of being sexually exploited and engaging in criminal activities.
Subject
Law,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology,Health(social science)
Reference65 articles.
1. Akers, R.L.
(1997),
Criminological Theories: Introduction and Evaluation
, 2nd ed., Roxbury, Los Angeles, CA.
2. Alleyne, E.
and
Wood, J.L.
(2010), “Gang involvement: psychological and behavioral characteristics of gang members, peripheral youth and non-gang youth”,
Aggressive Behavior
, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 423-36.
3. Archer, J.
(2010), “Derivation and assessment of a hypermasculine values questionnaire”,
British Journal of Social Psychology
, Vol. 49 No. 3, pp. 525-51.
4. Bagley, C.
,
Bolitho, F.
and
Bertrand, L.
(1997), “Norm and construct validity of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in Canadian high school populations: implications for counselling”,
Canadian Journal of Counselling
, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 82-92.
5. Bennett, T.
and
Holloway, K.
(2004), “Gang membership, drugs and crime in the UK”,
British Journal of Criminology
, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 305-23.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献