Venus envy: problematizing solidarity behaviour and queen bees

Author:

Mavin Sharon

Abstract

PurposeAims to critique solidarity behaviour as a means of advancing women in management; questions the queen bee concept and raises negative relations between women.Design/methodology/approachConceptual paper which critiques extant research and approaches to advancing women in management identifying alternative perspectives.FindingsAssumptions of solidarity behaviour set expectations of senior women which cannot be fulfilled. Continued use of the unproblematized queen bee label, without acknowledgement of the embedded gendered context for women in senior management, perpetuates a “blame the woman” perspective as a “one‐woman responsibility”. Emerging from the gendered nature of organization, female misogyny may be a means of exploring negative relations between women to challenge existing gendered organizations which sustain the status quo.Research limitations/implicationsMediates recommendations of senior women as mentors and role models, whilst blaming them for being more male than men, by calling for action to challenge and change the gendered social order which impacts on women in management. Empirical research is required.Originality/valueConsiders the impact of negative relations between women to highlight how the gendered social order encourages and exacerbates differences between women; challenges assumptions of solidarity behaviour and problematizes the queen bee label.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Gender Studies

Reference49 articles.

1. Abramson, J. (1975), The Invincible Woman: Discrimination in the Academic Profession, Jossey‐Bass, London.

2. Acker, J. (1990), “Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organisations”, Gender & Society, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 139‐58.

3. Adler, N.J. (1999), “Global leaders: women of influence”, in Powell, G. (Ed.), The Handbook of Gender, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

4. Bryans, P. and Mavin, S. (2003), “Women learning to become managers: learning to fit in or to play a different game?”, Management Learning, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 111‐34.

5. Catalyst (2000), “2000 catalyst census of women corporate officers and top earners”, available at: www.catalystwomen.org/research/census.htm.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3