Patient involvement in Danish health care

Author:

Vrangbaek Karsten

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate different types of patient involvement in Denmark, and to discuss the potential implications of pursuing several strategies for patient involvement simultaneously. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents a preliminary framework for analysis of patient involvement in health care. This framework is used to analyze key governance features of patient involvement in Denmark based on previous research papers and reports describing patient involvement in Danish health care. Findings – Patient involvement is important in Denmark at the rhetorical level, and many policies and initiatives have been introduced. All three governance forms (voice, choice and co-production) are used. However, there are important barriers and limitations in translating the rhetoric into practice, and potential synergy and negative synergy effects can be identified when pursuing the strategies at the same time. Research limitations/implications – Because of the chosen research approach, the research results may lack generalizability. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to test the proposed framework further. Practical implications – The paper includes implications for the development of patient involvement in health care. Originality/value – This paper fulfills a need to study different types of patient involvement and to develop a theoretical framework for characterizing and analyzing such involvement strategies.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference49 articles.

1. Anell, A. , Glenngård, A.H. and Merkur, S. (2012), “Sweden: health system review”, Health Systems in Transition , Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 1-159.

2. Birk, H.O. and Henriksen, L.O. (2012), “Which factors decided general practitioners’ choice of hospital on behalf of their patients in an area with free choice of public hospital? A questionnaire study”, BMC Health Serv Res , Vol. 12 No. 126, doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-126.

3. Borum, F. (red.) (2003), Ledelse I Sygehusvæsenet , Handelshøjskolens forlag, København.

4. Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2011), The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management , Ashgate, Farnham.

5. Danske Regioner (2013), “Patienten som partner”, Notat dateret 25-02-2013, Sag nr. 12/1807, Dokumentnr. 9432/1. Offentliggjort på, available at: www.regioner.dk www.regioner.dk/∼/media/Mediebibliotek_2011/SUNDHED/Publikationer%20og%20h%C3%B8ringssvar/Patienten%20som%20partner.ashx

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3