Health service provider views on measuring patient involvement in healthcare: an interview study with researchers, clinicians, managers, and policymakers

Author:

Toft Bente Skovsby1,Ellegaard Trine1,Nielsen Berit Kjærside2,Rossen Camilla Blach3,Hørlück Jens Thusgaard2,Ludvigsen Mette Spliid4,Bekker Hilary Louise5,Rodkjær Lotte Ørneborg1

Affiliation:

1. Aarhus University Hospital

2. DEFACTUM

3. Regionshospitalet Silkeborg

4. Regional Hospital Randers

5. University of Leeds

Abstract

Abstract Background Strategies aimed at promoting patient involvement vary in purpose across different healthcare settings and are assessed using a wide range of outcomes. However, there is no consensus on the most appropriate measurement tools or ways to evaluate patient involvement initiatives. This qualitative study aimed to explore the perspectives of stakeholders from micro, meso, and macro levels within the Danish healthcare system on patient involvement and its measurement. MethodsThis descriptive, explorative study employed semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions to elicit participants’ views and experiences of patient involvement and measurement tools. A purposeful sample of participants was identified, to include decision makers, researchers, and health professionals (n=20) with experiences of patient involvement in healthcare at micro, meso, and macro levels across Danish organizations. Data underwent reflexive thematic analysis. Results Three main themes were identified: 1) Determining the purpose of patient involvement and measurement alignment; 2) Reflecting on the qualities, fit, and usefulness of measures; 3) Recognizing conflicting stakeholder paradigms. Despite the interest in and positive attitudes toward patient involvement, views on the meaning and value of evaluating involvement and innovating varied; in part, this was attributable to challenges in selecting criteria, methods, and measures for evaluation. Conclusion The findings indicate the need to integrate the perspectives of all key stakeholders in designing the evaluation of patient involvement initiatives. The application of a multiple stakeholder approach and co-production of a multidimensional evaluation may provide some common ground for selecting evaluation criteria and measurement tools in the healthcare setting. Trial registration Danish Data Protection Agency (1-16-02-400-21) 15 October 2021.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference54 articles.

1. Nolte E, Merkur S, Anell A. Achieving person-centred health systems: Evidence, strategies and challenges. Cambridge University Press; 2020.

2. The antecedents, forms and consequences of patient involvement: a narrative review of the literature;Snyder H;Int J Nurs Stud,2016

3. Patient involvement in Danish health care;Vrangbaek K;J Health Organ Manag,2015

4. Health Ministry MoI. : Bekendtgørelse af sundhedsloven [Publication of health law]. In: Lokaliseret d. vol. 8; 2017.

5. Nationale mål for. sundhedsvæsenet [National goal for the health care system] [https://sum.dk/Media/637697073524473744/Nationale%20M%c3%a5l%20for%20Sundhedsv%c3%a6senet%202021.pdf].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3